Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2002 Oct;55(8):1401-13.
doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(01)00272-6.

Physician evaluation of obesity in health surveys: "who are you calling fat?"

Kenneth F Ferraro  1 , Kimberlee B Holland
Affiliations

Physician evaluation of obesity in health surveys: "who are you calling fat?"

Kenneth F Ferraro et al. Soc Sci Med. 2002 Oct.

Abstract

Previous research on status generalization suggests that physicians may use non-medical factors in their evaluation, interpretation, and treatment of persons presenting for care. This study compares physicians' evaluations of obesity with physical measurements of body stature and fat collected from a large national health examination survey. While the anthropometric measures are strong predictors of physician evaluations of obesity, between 13% and 19% of the respondents were classified in ways that could not be predicted from the anthropometric measures. Moreover, personal and status characteristics were related to physicians' evaluations of obesity. Women, especially White and taller women, were more likely to be evaluated as obese than would be predicted from the anthropometric measures-African American women were less likely than their White counterparts to be so classified. Physicians' evaluation of obesity was least consistent with measured obesity for older respondents. Indeed among men, age was the most important status characteristic shaping physician evaluations: older men were more likely to be evaluated as obese. The findings suggest that the cluster of status characteristics is important to physicians during medical evaluations.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Percent agreement between respondent’s BMI and the physicians’ evaluation of obesity by age in NHANES I.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Adams CH, Smith NJ, Wilbur DC, Grady KE. The relationship of obesity to the frequency of pelvic examinations: Do physicians and patient attitudes make a difference? Women & Health. 1993;20:45–57. - PubMed
    1. Agell G, Rothblum ED. Effects of clients’ obesity and gender on the therapy judgments of psychologists. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice. 1991;22:223–229.
    1. Allison DB, Fontaine KR, Manson JE, Stevens J, VanItallie TB. Annual deaths attributable to obesity in the United States. Journal of the American Medical Association. 1999;282:1530–1538. - PubMed
    1. Allison PD. Comparing logit and probit coefficients across groups. Sociological Methods and Research. 1999;28:186–208.
    1. Berger JM, Fisek H, Norman RZ, Zelditch M., Jr . Status characteristics and social interaction: An expectation states approach. New York: Elsevier; 1977.

Publication types