Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1994 May;105(1):167-172.
doi: 10.1104/pp.105.1.167.

Comparison of Methods to Estimate Dark Respiration in the Light in Leaves of Two Woody Species

Affiliations

Comparison of Methods to Estimate Dark Respiration in the Light in Leaves of Two Woody Species

R. Villar et al. Plant Physiol. 1994 May.

Abstract

Dark respiration in the light was estimated in leaves of two woody species (Heteromeles arbutifolia Ait. and Lepechinia fragans Greene) using two different approaches based on gas-exchange techniques: the Kok method and the Laisk method. In all cases, dark respiration in the light was lower (P < 0.05) than respiration in darkness, indicating that dark respiration was inhibited in the light. Rates of dark respiration in the light estimated by the Laisk method were 52% higher (P < 0.05) than those estimated by the Kok method. Differences between the methods could be explained by the low ambient CO2 concentrations required by the Laisk approach. The mean value of the inhibition of respiration by light for the two species, corrected for the ambient CO2 concentration effect, was 55%. Despite the differences in leaf characteristics between the species, values of the CO2 photocompensation point, at which the rate of photosynthetic CO2 uptake equaled that of photorespiratory CO2 evolution, were very constant, suggesting an excellent consistency in the results obtained with the Laisk approach.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Plant Physiol. 1991 Apr;95(4):1270-6 - PubMed
    1. Plant Physiol. 1984 May;75(1):95-101 - PubMed
    1. Plant Physiol. 1987 Apr;83(4):1032-6 - PubMed
    1. Plant Physiol. 1988 Sep;88(1):69-76 - PubMed
    1. Plant Physiol. 1992 Feb;98(2):757-60 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources