Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2002 Sep 23;87(7):733-9.
doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6600522.

The imPaCT study: a randomised controlled trial to evaluate a hospital palliative care team

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

The imPaCT study: a randomised controlled trial to evaluate a hospital palliative care team

G W Hanks et al. Br J Cancer. .

Abstract

A randomised controlled trial was undertaken to assess the effectiveness of a hospital Palliative Care Team (PCT) on physical symptoms and health-related quality of life (HRQoL); patient, family carer and primary care professional reported satisfaction with care; and health service resource use. The full package of advice and support provided by a multidisciplinary specialist PCT ('full-PCT') was compared with limited telephone advice ('telephone-PCT', the control group) in the setting of a teaching hospital trust in the SW of England. The trial recruited 261 out of 684 new inpatient referrals; 175 were allocated to 'full-PCT', 86 to 'telephone-PCT' (2 : 1 randomisation); with 191 (73%) being assessed at 1 week. There were highly significant improvements in symptoms, HRQoL, mood and 'emotional bother' in 'full-PCT' at 1 week, maintained over the 4-week follow-up. A smaller effect was seen in 'telephone-PCT'; there were no significant differences between the groups. Satisfaction with care in both groups was high and there was no significant difference between them. These data reflect a high standard of care of patients dying of cancer and other chronic diseases in an acute hospital environment, but do not demonstrate a difference between the two models of service delivery of specialist palliative care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow of patients through the imPaCT trial
Figure 2
Figure 2
Weekly mean symptom scores of those patients who completed all six assessments (n=76)

References

    1. AaronsonNKAhmedzaiSBergmanBBullingerMCullADuezNJFilbertiAFlechtnerHFleishmanSBde HaesJCJMKaasaSKleeMOsobaDRazavidDRofeBSchraubSSneeuwKSullivanMTakedaF1993The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: A quality-of-life instrument for use in international trials in oncology J Natl Can Inst 85365375 - PubMed
    1. Addington-HallJMcCarthyM1995Dying from cancer: results of a national population-based investigation Pall Med 9295305 - PubMed
    1. Anonymous1989Terminal careless Br Med J 2991471
    1. Anonymous1994Dying for palliative care Br Med J 30916961699 - PMC - PubMed
    1. ArandaS2000Changing paradigms in research: do we need to rethink the future? Progr Pall Care 8193197

Publication types

MeSH terms