Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2002 Aug;37(4):985-1007.
doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0560.2002.62.x.

Effects of CAHPS health plan performance information on plan choices by New Jersey Medicaid beneficiaries

Donna O Farley  1 , Pamela Farley Short, Marc N Elliott, David E Kanouse, Julie A Brown, Ron D Hays
Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Effects of CAHPS health plan performance information on plan choices by New Jersey Medicaid beneficiaries

Donna O Farley et al. Health Serv Res. 2002 Aug.

Abstract

Objective: To assess the effects of CAHPS health plan performance information on plan choices and decision processes by New Jersey Medicaid beneficiaries.

Data sources/study setting: The study sample was a statewide sample of all new Medicaid cases that chose Medicaid health plans during April 1998. The study used state data on health maintenance organization (HMO) enrollments and survey data for a subset of these cases.

Study design: An experimental design was used, with new Medicaid cases randomly assigned to experimental or control groups. The experimental group received a CAHPS report along with the standard enrollment materials, and the control group did not.

Data collection: The HMO enrollment data were obtained from the state in June 1998, and evaluation survey data were collected from July to October 1998.

Principal findings: No effects of CAHPS information on HMO choices were found for the total sample. Further examination revealed that only about half the Medicaid cases said they received and read the plan report and there was an HMO with dominant Medicaid market share but low CAHPS performance scores. The subset of cases who read the report and did not choose this dominant HMO chose HMOs with higher CAHPS scores, on average, than did those in an equivalent control group.

Conclusions: Health plan performance information can influence plan choices by Medicaid beneficiaries, but will do so only if they actually read it. These findings suggest a need for enhancing dissemination of the information as well as further education to encourage informed choices.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Brown J, Nederend SE, Hays RD, Farley Short Pamela, Farley Donna O. “Special Issues in Assessing Care of Medicaid Recipients”. Medical Care. 1999;37(3, supplement):MS79–88. - PubMed
    1. Castles A, Goodwin P, Damberg C. Abstract Book of the Association of Health Services Research. vol. 14. Washington, DC: Association for Health Services Research; 1997. “Consumer Use of Quality of Care Information: An Evaluation of California Consumer HealthScope”; pp. 171–2.
    1. Chernew M, Scanlon DP. “Health Plan Report Cards and Insurance Choice”. Inquiry. 1998;35(1):9–22. - PubMed
    1. Crofton C, Lubalin J, Darby CS. “Foreword”. Medical Care. 1999;37(3, supplement):MS1–9. - PubMed
    1. Davis K, Collins KS, Schoen C, Morris C. “Choice Matters: Enrollees' Views of Their Health Plans”. Health Affairs. 1995;14(2):99–112. - PubMed

Publication types