An evaluation of the Man to Man self-help group in Colorado and Utah
- PMID: 12236836
- DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-5394.2002.105002.x
An evaluation of the Man to Man self-help group in Colorado and Utah
Abstract
Purpose: Two surveys were conducted to evaluate the Man to Man program, a prostate cancer self-help group of the American Cancer Society (ACS).
Description of study: The study involved two surveys in Colorado and Utah in 2001, one of program participants, the other of area urologists, respectively. A focus group also was conducted of African American men with prostate cancer in Denver, Colo.
Results: In total, 112 participants in the Man to Man program and 66 urologists participated in the study. Results of the participant survey indicated that men and their families found out about the group through other prostate cancer survivors, doctors, or the ACS. Monthly attendance at the groups ranged from 2 to 50 participants. Participants valued the prostate cancer treatment information, physician presentations, and social aspects that were offered. The results of the urologist survey indicated that 67% were aware of the Man to Man program, but most were not aware of the services it offered. Urologists learned of the group through Man to Man participants, other physicians, and the ACS. Focus group results suggested that a personal preference for access to other sources of support and information was a primary reason for nonattendance at Man to Man meetings.
Clinical implications: Attendance at Man to Man meetings is likely to be enhanced by focusing on basic prostate cancer information topics. Future evaluations of Man to Man meeting participation should focus on the role of women in the program. Most urologists were not familiar with the services offered by Man to Man. The ACS and the organizers of local Man to Man programs should target urologists in future outreach efforts.
Similar articles
-
Man to Man prostate cancer support groups.Cancer Pract. 1999 May-Jun;7(3):122-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-5394.1999.07307.x. Cancer Pract. 1999. PMID: 10352074
-
Comparison of perspectives on prostate cancer: analyses of survey data.Urology. 1997 Sep;50(3):366-72. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(97)00254-9. Urology. 1997. PMID: 9301699
-
Physician Recommendations Trump Patient Preferences in Prostate Cancer Treatment Decisions.Med Decis Making. 2017 Jan;37(1):56-69. doi: 10.1177/0272989X16662841. Epub 2016 Aug 10. Med Decis Making. 2017. PMID: 27510740 Free PMC article.
-
Current decision-making in prostate cancer therapy.Curr Opin Urol. 2008 May;18(3):275-8. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0b013e3282fba5f2. Curr Opin Urol. 2008. PMID: 18382237 Review.
-
[Communication preferences of patients with prostate cancer : Preferences regarding the communication of bad news of patients with prostate cancer in Germany-results of an anonymous patient survey].Urologe A. 2016 Oct;55(10):1339-1346. doi: 10.1007/s00120-016-0154-x. Urologe A. 2016. PMID: 27306355 Review. German.
Cited by
-
Men's and carers' experiences of care for prostate cancer: a narrative literature review.Health Expect. 2009 Sep;12(3):301-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2009.00546.x. Health Expect. 2009. PMID: 19754693 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The value of prostate cancer support groups: a pilot study of primary physicians' perspectives.BMC Fam Pract. 2014 Mar 28;15:56. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-15-56. BMC Fam Pract. 2014. PMID: 24673983 Free PMC article.
-
The accessibility and acceptability of self-management support interventions for men with long term conditions: a systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative studies.BMC Public Health. 2014 Nov 27;14:1230. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-1230. BMC Public Health. 2014. PMID: 25428230 Free PMC article.
-
Prostate cancer support groups: Canada-based specialists' perspectives.Am J Mens Health. 2015 Mar;9(2):163-72. doi: 10.1177/1557988314543510. Epub 2014 Jul 24. Am J Mens Health. 2015. PMID: 25061087 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials