Attentional modulation of the nociceptive processing into the human brain: selective spatial attention, probability of stimulus occurrence, and target detection effects on laser evoked potentials
- PMID: 12237181
- DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3959(02)00051-9
Attentional modulation of the nociceptive processing into the human brain: selective spatial attention, probability of stimulus occurrence, and target detection effects on laser evoked potentials
Abstract
Laser evoked potentials (LEPs) are brain responses to activation of skin nociceptors by laser heat stimuli. LEPs consist of three components: N1, N2, and P2. Previous reports have suggested that in contrast to earlier activities (N1), LEPs responses after 230-250 ms (N2-P2) are modulated by attention to painful laser stimuli. However, the experimental paradigms used were not designed to specify the attentional processes involved in these LEP modulations. We investigated the effects of selective spatial attention and oddball tasks on LEPs. CO(2) laser stimuli of two different intensities were delivered on the dorsum of both hands of ten subjects. One intensity was frequently presented, and the other rarely. Subjects were asked to pay attention to stimuli delivered on one hand and to count rare stimuli, while ignoring stimuli on the other hand. Frequent and rare attended stimuli evoked enhanced N160 (N1) and N230 (N2) components in comparison to LEPs from unattended stimuli. Both components showed scalp distribution contralateral to the stimulus location. The vertex P400 (P2) was unaffected by spatial attention and stimulus location, but its amplitude increased after rare stimuli, whether attended or unattended. An additional parietal P600 component was induced by the attended rare stimuli. It is suggested that several attentional processes can modify nociceptive processing in the brain at different stages. LEP activities in the time-range of N1 and N2 (120-270 ms) showed evidence of processes modulated by the direction of spatial attention. Conversely, processes underlying P2 (400 ms) were not affected by spatial attention, but by the probability of the stimulus. This probability effect was not due to P3b-related processes that were observed at a later latency (600 ms). Indeed, P600 could be seen as a P3b evoked by conscious detection of rare targets.
Copyright 2002 International Association for the Study of Pain
Comment in
-
Attention, novelty, and pain.Pain. 2002 Sep;99(1-2):1-3. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3959(02)00050-7. Pain. 2002. PMID: 12237178 Review. No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Somatosensory spatial attention modulates amplitudes, latencies, and latency jitter of laser-evoked brain potentials.J Neurophysiol. 2015 Apr 1;113(7):2760-8. doi: 10.1152/jn.00070.2015. Epub 2015 Feb 11. J Neurophysiol. 2015. PMID: 25673731 Free PMC article.
-
Nociceptive processing in the human brain of infrequent task-relevant and task-irrelevant noxious stimuli. A study with event-related potentials evoked by CO2 laser radiant heat stimuli.Pain. 2003 Jun;103(3):237-248. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(02)00451-7. Pain. 2003. PMID: 12791430 Clinical Trial.
-
Electrophysiological correlates of attentional orientation in humans to strong intensity deviant nociceptive stimuli, inside and outside the focus of spatial attention.Neurosci Lett. 2003 Mar 20;339(2):107-10. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3940(02)01485-4. Neurosci Lett. 2003. PMID: 12614906
-
Contribution of attentional and cognitive factors to laser evoked brain potentials.Neurophysiol Clin. 2003 Dec;33(6):293-301. doi: 10.1016/j.neucli.2003.10.004. Neurophysiol Clin. 2003. PMID: 14678843 Review.
-
Brain generators of laser-evoked potentials: from dipoles to functional significance.Neurophysiol Clin. 2003 Dec;33(6):279-92. doi: 10.1016/j.neucli.2003.10.008. Neurophysiol Clin. 2003. PMID: 14678842 Review.
Cited by
-
Evidence for a Priori Existence of Attentional Bias Subgroups in Emotional Processing of Aversive Stimuli.Front Behav Neurosci. 2017 May 12;11:87. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2017.00087. eCollection 2017. Front Behav Neurosci. 2017. PMID: 28553210 Free PMC article.
-
Nociceptor spontaneous activity is responsible for fragmenting non-rapid eye movement sleep in mouse models of neuropathic pain.Sci Transl Med. 2024 Apr 17;16(743):eadg3036. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.adg3036. Epub 2024 Apr 17. Sci Transl Med. 2024. PMID: 38630850 Free PMC article.
-
Intense pain influences the cortical processing of visual stimuli projected onto the sensitized skin.Pain. 2017 Apr;158(4):691-697. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000816. Pain. 2017. PMID: 28030473 Free PMC article.
-
Observation of nociceptive detection thresholds and cortical evoked potentials: Go/no-go versus two-interval forced choice.Atten Percept Psychophys. 2022 May;84(4):1359-1369. doi: 10.3758/s13414-022-02484-5. Epub 2022 Apr 5. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2022. PMID: 35381960 Free PMC article.
-
Pain modulation in waking and hypnosis in women: event-related potentials and sources of cortical activity.PLoS One. 2015 Jun 1;10(6):e0128474. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0128474. eCollection 2015. PLoS One. 2015. PMID: 26030417 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous