Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1997 Aug;9(8):1495-1504.
doi: 10.1105/tpc.9.8.1495.

A Transcriptionally Active State Is Required for Post-Transcriptional Silencing (Cosuppression) of Nitrate Reductase Host Genes and Transgenes

Affiliations

A Transcriptionally Active State Is Required for Post-Transcriptional Silencing (Cosuppression) of Nitrate Reductase Host Genes and Transgenes

H. Vaucheret et al. Plant Cell. 1997 Aug.

Abstract

Using tobacco nitrate reductase cosuppression as a model system of post-transcriptional gene silencing, we analyzed the influence of DNA and RNA dosages both together and independently. For this purpose, zero, one, two, or four active or transcriptionally silenced copies of a cauliflower mosaic virus 35S-Nia2 transgene were combined by transformation and subsequent crosses with zero, one, two, three, or four active, disrupted, or transcriptionally repressed copies of the wild-type host Nia genes. The analysis of the corresponding transgenic lines revealed that (1) the percentage of isogenic plants that are affected by cosuppression depends directly upon the relative dosage of both host gene and transgene; (2) transcriptional silencing of the 35S-Nia transgene impedes cosuppression; and (3) the absence of host gene transcription reduces the frequency of cosuppression or delays its triggering. Taken together, these results indicate that transgene DNA per se is not sufficient to trigger post-transcriptional cosuppression of nitrate reductase host genes and transgenes. The requirement for a transcriptionally active state is discussed with respect to both the RNA dosage and the DNA-DNA pairing hypotheses.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Plant Mol Biol. 1995 Oct;29(1):149-59 - PubMed
    1. Plant Cell. 1996 Feb;8(2):179-188 - PubMed
    1. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1995 Jun;7(3):399-405 - PubMed
    1. Mol Gen Genet. 1990 Dec;224(3):477-81 - PubMed
    1. Plant Mol Biol. 1996 Dec;32(6):1075-83 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources