Workers' compensation claims related to natural rubber latex gloves among Oregon healthcare employees from 1987-1998
- PMID: 12238952
- PMCID: PMC128812
- DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-2-21
Workers' compensation claims related to natural rubber latex gloves among Oregon healthcare employees from 1987-1998
Abstract
Background: Occupational reaction to natural rubber latex (NRL) glove use by healthcare employees has been an area of increasing concern. Unfortunately, there is little data demonstrating the prevalence and severity of actual reactivity to NRL.
Method: Occupational reaction to NRL was estimated using workers' compensation claims filed by healthcare employees in Oregon for the period of 1987-1998. For the first ten years, these claims were estimated by source and conditions consistent with NRL glove reactions, while in the last two years a specific code developed in 1997 for NRL glove reactions was also employed.
Results: The claim rate was on average 0.58 per 10,000 healthcare workers annually, which constituted 0.29% of all workers' compensation claims. The most common condition experienced was dermatitis (80%) and most common body part affected was the hands (55.4%). The majority of claimants, 45 (69.2%), reported taking less than a month off work, suggesting most reactions were minor in nature, although one fatality was reported. The average NRL claim cost was $8,309.48. Overall the average cost per insured healthcare worker was approximately $0.50 per year. The occupational groups with the highest number of claims were nurses (30.8% of claimants) and nursing aides and orderlies (24.6% of claimants).
Conclusions: In comparison with other workers' compensation claims filed by healthcare workers during this period, 0.25% of the total was potentially related to NRL gloves. The rare incidence of respiratory and ocular claims is inconsistent with the hypothesis that asthmatic or conjunctival reactions to NRL gloves are common.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Natural rubber latex allergy workers' compensation claims: Washington State healthcare workers, 1991-1999.Appl Occup Environ Hyg. 2002 Apr;17(4):267-75. doi: 10.1080/10473220252826574. Appl Occup Environ Hyg. 2002. PMID: 11942670
-
Workers' compensation claims from latex glove use.J Occup Environ Med. 2001 Jul;43(7):590-1; author reply 591-3. doi: 10.1097/00043764-200107000-00002. J Occup Environ Med. 2001. PMID: 11464387 No abstract available.
-
Workers' compensation latex claims.J Occup Environ Med. 2001 Jul;43(7):589-90; author reply 591-3. doi: 10.1097/00043764-200107000-00001. J Occup Environ Med. 2001. PMID: 11464386 No abstract available.
-
Current state of occupational latex allergy.Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2020 Apr;20(2):112-116. doi: 10.1097/ACI.0000000000000611. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2020. PMID: 31850921 Review.
-
A review of current literature on epidemiology of immediate glove irritation and latex allergy.Occup Med (Lond). 1999 Jan;49(1):3-9. doi: 10.1093/occmed/49.1.3. Occup Med (Lond). 1999. PMID: 10451581 Review.
Cited by
-
Incidence of occupational contact dermatitis in healthcare workers: a systematic review.J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2021 Jun;35(6):1285-1289. doi: 10.1111/jdv.17096. Epub 2021 Feb 12. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2021. PMID: 33336403 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Konrad C, Fieber T, Gerber H, et al. The prevalence of latex sensitivity among anesthesiology staff. Anesth Analg. 1997;84:629–633. - PubMed
-
- Douglas R, Morton J, Czarry D, et al. Prevalence of IgE mediated allergy to latex in hospital nursing staff. Aust N Z J Med. 1997;27:165–169. - PubMed
-
- Grzybowski M, Ownby DR, Peyser PA, et al. The prevalence of anti-latex IgE antibodies among registered nurses. J Clin Immunol. 1996;98:535–544. - PubMed
-
- Lagier F, Vervloet D, Lhermet I, et al. Prevalence of latex allergy in operating room nurses. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1992;90:319–22. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical