Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2002 Aug 17;360(9332):516-20.
doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(02)09740-4.

Comparison of effects of oral deferiprone and subcutaneous desferrioxamine on myocardial iron concentrations and ventricular function in beta-thalassaemia

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparison of effects of oral deferiprone and subcutaneous desferrioxamine on myocardial iron concentrations and ventricular function in beta-thalassaemia

Lisa J Anderson et al. Lancet. .

Abstract

Background: Despite the introduction of the parenteral iron chelator desferrioxamine more than 30 years ago, 50% of patients with thalassaemia major die before the age of 35 years, predominantly from iron-induced heart failure. The only alternative treatment is oral deferiprone, but its long-term efficacy on myocardial iron concentrations is unknown.

Methods: We compared myocardial iron content and cardiac function in 15 patients receiving long-term deferiprone treatment with 30 matched thalassaemia major controls who were on long-term treatment with desferrioxamine. Myocardial iron concentrations were measured by a new magnetic-resonance T2* technique, which shows values inversely related to tissue iron concentration.

Findings: The deferiprone group had significantly less myocardial iron (median 34.0 ms vs 11.4 ms, p=0.02) and higher ejection fractions (mean 70% [SD 6.5] vs 63% [6.9], p=0.004) than the desferrioxamine controls. Excess myocardial iron (T2* <20 ms) was less common in the deferiprone group than in the desferrioxamine controls (four [27%] vs 20 [67%], p=0.025), as was severe (T2* <10 ms) iron overload (one [7%] vs 11 [37%], p=0.04). The odds ratio for excess myocardial iron in the desferrioxamine controls versus the deferiprone group was 5.5 (95% CI 1.2-28.8).

Interpretation: Conventional chelation treatment with subcutaneous desferrioxamine does not prevent excess cardiac iron deposition in two-thirds of patients with thalassaemia major, placing them at risk of heart failure and its complications. Oral deferiprone is more effective than desferrioxamine in removal of myocardial iron.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources