Comparative performance of two copper-wired IUDs (ML Cu 250 and T Cu 200: immediate postpartum and interval insertion
- PMID: 12261715
Comparative performance of two copper-wired IUDs (ML Cu 250 and T Cu 200: immediate postpartum and interval insertion
Abstract
PIP: A comparative randomized study of the ML Cu 250 and the T Cu 200 was conducted; the results of 1956 insertions (of which 957 concerned the ML Cu 250) are reported. All recipients were women requesting an IUD (Department of Obstetrics, University of Gent, Belgium) and lacking contraindication to its use. The IUDs were inserted at interim or immediately after delivery of placenta at, or about term. When inserted at interim the 2 IUDs had a comparable anti-fertility effect, but the ML Cu 250 was significantly better retained and the T Cu 200 was significantly better tolerated. Both the T Cu 200 and the ML Cu 250 were more often expelled by the younger recipients. Performance of the devices was influenced by the woman's gravidity/parity. No significant difference in performance was found between the 2 IUDs after immediate postpartum insertion. This procedure is effective, well tolerated and safe. For both IUD types, the pregnancy and expulsion rates are significantly higher after immediate postpartum placement than after interval insertion. Due to the fact that the majority of the expulsions occur early, close follow-up of acceptors is essential.
Similar articles
-
A comparison of two IUDs: Multiload Cu 250 and Copper T 200.Contracept Deliv Syst. 1983 Jan;4(1):9-13. Contracept Deliv Syst. 1983. PMID: 12264721
-
[Nova-T and Copper-T 200 in a five year's clinical comparison].Contracept Fertil Sex (Paris). 1983 Nov;11(11):1179-84. Contracept Fertil Sex (Paris). 1983. PMID: 12312701 French.
-
Copper IUDs.Contracept Deliv Syst. 1983 Jul;4(3):175-85. Contracept Deliv Syst. 1983. PMID: 12265360
-
Immediate postpartum provision of long-acting reversible contraception.Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Dec;27(6):460-4. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000224. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2015. PMID: 26536209 Review.
-
Immediate Postpartum Intrauterine Contraception Insertion.Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2015 Dec;42(4):569-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ogc.2015.08.001. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2015. PMID: 26598300 Review.
Cited by
-
Continuation of Copper T in Immediate Postplacental, Immediate Postabortal and Interval Period of Insertion.J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2022 Feb;72(1):38-46. doi: 10.1007/s13224-021-01497-8. Epub 2021 May 28. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2022. PMID: 35125737 Free PMC article.
-
Immediate postpartum insertion of intrauterine device for contraception.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jun 26;2015(6):CD003036. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003036.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015. PMID: 26115018 Free PMC article.
-
U.S. Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use, 2024.MMWR Recomm Rep. 2024 Aug 8;73(4):1-126. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.rr7304a1. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2024. PMID: 39106314 Free PMC article.
-
Immediate versus delayed postpartum insertion of contraceptive implant and IUD for contraception.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 27;10(10):CD011913. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011913.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 36302159 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical