The Canada-United States joint immigration study: issues in data comparability
- PMID: 12280906
The Canada-United States joint immigration study: issues in data comparability
Abstract
PIP: The Canada-US immigration project is an attempt to assess carefully the flows, trends, and characteristics of immigrants between the 2 countries. The primary focus for data is the census information derived from the 1980 US and 1981 Canadian censuses. Some observations of the comparison follow. 1) US-born immigrants tend to migrate later. 2) Immigrants have an older age structure than the total population. 3) The sex ratio pattern is similar with older migrants having lower ratios. 4) Immigration of elderly/retired is not a common pattern. 5) Changes in regional destinations is a basic feature of immigration flows. The destination of US immigrants shifted over time from northern states to southern states. Destinations of Canadian immigrants shifted over time from Quebec and prairie provinces to Ontario and British Columbia. 6) A higher proportion of US immigrants ever married and were widowed; higher proportions of Canadian immigrants divorced, and lower proportions separated. These aspects reflect age structure. 7) US immigrants' fertility is similar to the US population in general; Canadian immigrants' fertility is similar to the Canadian population in general. 8) US immigrants born in Canada have a considerably higher attainment. 9) Males aged 16-64 among US immigrants born in Canada have a consistently higher labor force participation rate. 10) Professional specialty occupations increase in importance in the 1975-1980 period in both countries. 11) Incomes of recent immigrants who were full-time, year-round workers from Canada or the US were well above the incomes of the native populations of either country. Comparability had to be examined in light of the variations built into the 2 censuses. Some of these issues are: 1) differences in sampling and collection methods, 2) differences in under/over-enumeration, 3) misreporting of country of birth, 4) differences in questions used, 5) different editing and imputation procedures applied, 6) variations in residence rules, and 7) the exclusion or inclusion of certain groups in the national census counts.
Similar articles
-
One century of foreign immigration to the United States: 1880-1979.Int Migr. 1985 Sep;23(3):309-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2435.1985.tb00322.x. Int Migr. 1985. PMID: 12159645
-
Female predominance of immigration to the United States since 1930: a first look.Int Migr Rev. 1984 Winter;18(4 Spec No):908-63. Int Migr Rev. 1984. PMID: 12340340
-
[Categories of immigrants and "levels of immigration" in Canada: a voluntarist policy].Rev Eur Migr Int. 1986 Nov;2(2):145-64. Rev Eur Migr Int. 1986. PMID: 12341013 French.
-
Sex ratio patterns in population estimates.Popul Trends. 2009 Autumn;(137):41-50. doi: 10.1057/pt.2009.33. Popul Trends. 2009. PMID: 19835114 Review.
-
Older international migrants: who migrates to England and Wales in later life?Popul Trends. 2009 Autumn;(137):33-40. doi: 10.1057/pt.2009.32. Popul Trends. 2009. PMID: 19835113 Review.