Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2002 Sep;111(9):811-6.
doi: 10.1177/000348940211100909.

Comparison of various methods of electromyographic monitoring of the recurrent laryngeal nerve in thyroid surgery

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparison of various methods of electromyographic monitoring of the recurrent laryngeal nerve in thyroid surgery

Kurt P Tschopp et al. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2002 Sep.

Abstract

In the present study, 3 types of electrodes for recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) monitoring are compared: 1) intralaryngeal surface electrodes attached to a conventional endotracheal tube, 2) monopolar needle electrodes placed on the vocal cords by direct laryngoscopy, and 3) bipolar needle electrodes inserted intraoperatively through the cricothyroid ligament. Data were collected from stimulation of 21 RLNs in 16 patients undergoing thyroid surgery. The reliability in terms of distinct electromyographic (EMG) potentials following stimulation of the RLN was 100% with monopolar and bipolar needle electrodes and 76% with intralaryngeal surface electrodes. The mean (+/-SD) amplitudes of the EMG potentials were 1.61 +/- 1.6 mV, 2.37 +/- 1.8 mV, and 0.35 +/- 0.4 mV for the monopolar endolaryngeal, bipolar transligament, and intralaryngeal surface electrodes, respectively. The advantages and disadvantages of each type of electrode are discussed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources