Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2002 Oct;57(10):865-8.
doi: 10.1136/thorax.57.10.865.

Airway and systemic effects of hydrofluoroalkane fluticasone and beclomethasone in patients with asthma

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Airway and systemic effects of hydrofluoroalkane fluticasone and beclomethasone in patients with asthma

G P Currie et al. Thorax. 2002 Oct.

Abstract

Background: With the transition to hydrofluoroalkane-134a propellants in metered dose inhalers, it is important to consider the efficacy and safety profiles of formulations containing inhaled corticosteroids. We examined the airway and systemic effects of hydrofluoroalkane-134a fluticasone propionate (FLU-HFA) and beclomethasone dipropionate (BEC-HFA) at recommended labelled doses.

Methods: Twenty mild to moderate asthmatics were randomised in crossover fashion to receive 6 weeks of 500 micro g/day followed by 1000 micro g/day FLU-HFA and BEC-HFA. Measurements were made at baseline after placebo run in and washout, and after each randomised treatment. The primary airway outcome for benefit was the dose of methacholine provoking a fall in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)) of 20% or more (methacholine PD(20)) and for systemic adverse effects was overnight urinary cortisol/creatinine (OUCC).

Results: For mean responses, both doses of BEC-HFA and FLU-HFA produced significant improvements in PD(20) compared with baseline. The improvement was not significantly greater with 1000 micro g/day FLU-HFA versus BEC-HFA, a 1.69 fold difference (95% CI 0.94 to 3.04). Both doses of BEC-HFA but not FLU-HFA caused significant suppression of OUCC compared with baseline, with significantly (p<0.05) lower values at 1000 micro g/day for BEC-HFA versus FLU-HFA (1.97 fold difference (95% CI 1.28 to 3.02)).

Conclusion: There was no difference in the airway and systemic effects in patients with mild to moderate asthma between FLU-HFA and BEC-HFA at a dose of 500 micro g/day. At 1000 micro g/day there was increased systemic bioactivity with BEC-HFA compared with FLU-HFA, without any gain in airway efficacy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Lancet. 1999 Oct 16;354(9187):1357-8 - PubMed
    1. Thorax. 1995 Dec;50(12):1280-4 - PubMed
    1. Chest. 1999 Nov;116(5):1304-12 - PubMed
    1. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1999 Dec;48(6):866-8 - PubMed
    1. Respir Med. 2000 Jun;94 Suppl B:S3-9 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms