World population growth, family planning, and American foreign policy
- PMID: 12346346
- DOI: 10.1017/s0898030600004152
World population growth, family planning, and American foreign policy
Abstract
PIP: The US decision since the 1960s to link foreign policy with family planning and population control is noteworthy for its intention to change the demographic structure of foreign countries and the magnitude of the initiative. The current population ideologies are part of the legacy of 19th century views on science, morality, and political economy. Strong constraints were placed on US foreign policy since World War II, particularly due to presumptions about the role of developing countries in Cold War ideology. Domestic debates revolved around issues of feminism, birth control, abortion, and family political issues. Since the 1960s, environmental degradation and resource depletion were an added global dimension of US population issues. Between 1935 and 1958 birth control movements evolved from the ideologies of utopian socialists, Malthusians, women's rights activists, civil libertarians, and advocates of sexual freedom. There was a shift from acceptance of birth control to questions about the role of national government in supporting distribution of birth control. Immediately postwar the debates over birth control were outside political circles. The concept of family planning as a middle class family issue shifted the focus from freeing women from the burdens of housework to making women more efficient housewives. Family planning could not be taken as a national policy concern without justification as a major issue, a link to national security, belief in the success of intervention, and a justifiable means of inclusion in public policy. US government involvement began with agricultural education, technological assistance, and economic development that would satisfy the world's growing population. Cold War politics forced population growth as an issue to be considered within the realm of foreign policy and diplomacy. US government sponsored family planning was enthusiastic during 1967-74 but restrained during the 1980s. The 1990s has been an era of redefinition of the issues and increased divisiveness among environmentalists, feminists, and population control advocates. The current justification of US population program assistance is based on concern for the health of women and children. Future changes will be dependent on ideology, theology, and political philosophy.
Similar articles
-
Clinton administration forging population-foreign policy links.Popul Today. 1994 Dec;22(12):1-2. Popul Today. 1994. PMID: 12288094
-
Population control I: Birth of an ideology.Int J Health Serv. 1997;27(3):523-40. doi: 10.2190/BL3N-XAJX-0YQB-VQBX. Int J Health Serv. 1997. PMID: 9285280 Review.
-
China's one-child family: a famine-forced decision.ZPG Report. 1985 May-Jun;17(2):1. ZPG Report. 1985. PMID: 12340334
-
The birth control movement before Roe v. Wade.J Policy Hist. 1995;7(1):22-52. doi: 10.1017/s0898030600004139. J Policy Hist. 1995. PMID: 12346344
-
Power and politics in international funding for reproductive health: the US Global Gag Rule.Reprod Health Matters. 2004 Nov;12(24):128-37. doi: 10.1016/s0968-8080(04)24140-4. Reprod Health Matters. 2004. PMID: 15626203 Review.
Cited by
-
Between the West and Asia: "Humanistic" Japanese Family Planning in the Cold War.East Asian Sci Technol Soc. 2016 Dec;10(4):445-467. doi: 10.1215/18752160-3149695. Epub 2015 Aug 5. East Asian Sci Technol Soc. 2016. PMID: 29046737 Free PMC article.
-
Why did the Japanese Government take so long to approve the intrauterine contraceptive device?Reprod Biomed Soc Online. 2018 Oct 16;6:45-54. doi: 10.1016/j.rbms.2018.09.002. eCollection 2018 Aug. Reprod Biomed Soc Online. 2018. PMID: 30480152 Free PMC article.