Body mass scaling of frontal area in competitive cyclists not using aero-handlebars
- PMID: 12355191
- DOI: 10.1007/s00421-002-0662-9
Body mass scaling of frontal area in competitive cyclists not using aero-handlebars
Abstract
This study was designed to evaluate the scaling relationship between body mass ( m(b)) and projected frontal area ( A(P)) in competitive male cyclists using traditional drop-style handlebars. A group of 21 male cyclists [mean (SD) m(b) 74.4 (7.2) kg, height 1.82 (0.06) m, age 23.6 (5.1) years] had A(P) determined from photographs taken while seated on their own racing bicycles in four body positions: (1) stem position; (2) brake hoods position; (3) drops position; (4) traditional aero-position. For each position, A(P) for the body of the cyclist (Body A(P)), as well as the cyclist and his bicycle (Total A(P)), were determined. Body A(P) was significantly smaller than Total A(P) in all four positions by a nearly constant bicycle A(P) of 0.117-0.124 m(2). Using multiple log-linear regression analysis procedures, prediction equations were developed for both Body A(P) and Total A(P) (dependent variables) using a cluster of binary-coded variables to indicate body position and m(b) as independent variables ( n=88 observations). The regression analysis revealed that Body A(P) scaled with m(b) to the +0.720 power [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.585-0.855], which did not differ significantly from the +0.762 exponent reported previously for Body A(P) whilst using aero-handlebars. In contrast, Total A(P) scaled with m(b) to the +0.594 power (95% CI: 0.468-0.720) which was significantly lower than +0.762 exponent reported previously. The lower exponent for Total A(P) is explained by the nearly constant contribution of the bicycle A(P) to Total A(P) (mean bicycle A(P)=0.122 m(2)). These data help to explain the determinants of A(P) and aerodynamic drag in competitive male cyclists who use the traditional body postures.
Similar articles
-
New method to estimate the cycling frontal area.Int J Sports Med. 2009 Apr;30(4):266-72. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1105940. Epub 2009 Feb 6. Int J Sports Med. 2009. PMID: 19199206
-
The effect of body position on the energy cost of cycling.Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1991 Aug;23(8):949-53. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1991. PMID: 1956270
-
Body mass scaling of projected frontal area in competitive cyclists.Eur J Appl Physiol. 2001 Aug;85(3-4):358-66. doi: 10.1007/s004210100424. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2001. PMID: 11560092
-
The influence of body mass in endurance bicycling.Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1994 Jan;26(1):58-63. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1994. PMID: 8133740 Review.
-
Allometric scaling of mammalian metabolism.J Exp Biol. 2005 May;208(Pt 9):1611-9. doi: 10.1242/jeb.01501. J Exp Biol. 2005. PMID: 15855392 Review.
Cited by
-
On the effect of changing handgrip position on joint specific power and cycling kinematics in recreational and professional cyclists.PLoS One. 2020 Aug 19;15(8):e0237768. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237768. eCollection 2020. PLoS One. 2020. PMID: 32813742 Free PMC article.
-
The effects of bicycle frame geometry on muscle activation and power during a wingate anaerobic test.J Sports Sci Med. 2006 Mar 1;5(1):25-32. eCollection 2006. J Sports Sci Med. 2006. PMID: 24198678 Free PMC article.
-
Gear, inertial work and road slopes as determinants of biomechanics in cycling.Eur J Appl Physiol. 2003 Oct;90(3-4):372-6. doi: 10.1007/s00421-003-0948-6. Epub 2003 Oct 7. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2003. PMID: 14530979
-
Body size as a determinant of the 1-h cycling record at sea level and altitude.Eur J Appl Physiol. 2005 Mar;93(5-6):547-54. doi: 10.1007/s00421-004-1256-5. Epub 2004 Dec 14. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2005. PMID: 15599588
-
The energetics of cycling on Earth, Moon and Mars.Eur J Appl Physiol. 2011 Mar;111(3):357-66. doi: 10.1007/s00421-010-1410-1. Epub 2010 Mar 27. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2011. PMID: 20349082 Review.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous