Why we should not seek individual informed consent for participation in health services research
- PMID: 12356960
- PMCID: PMC1733638
- DOI: 10.1136/jme.28.5.313
Why we should not seek individual informed consent for participation in health services research
Abstract
Ethics committees now require that individuals give informed consent to much health services research, in the same way as for clinical research. This is misguided. Existing ethical guidelines do not help us decide how to seek consent in these cases, and have allowed managerial experimentation to remain largely unchecked. Inappropriate requirements for individual consent can institutionalise health inequalities and reduce access to services for vulnerable groups. This undermines the fundamental purpose of the National Health Service (NHS), and ignores our rights and duties as its members, explored here. Alternative forms of community consent should be actively pursued.
Similar articles
-
New governance arrangements for research ethics committees: is facilitating research achieved at the cost of participants' interest.J Med Ethics. 2002 Oct;28(5):318-21. doi: 10.1136/jme.28.5.318. J Med Ethics. 2002. PMID: 12356961 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Ethical review of health service research in the UK: implications for nursing.J Adv Nurs. 2002 Nov;40(4):379-86. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2002.02385.x. J Adv Nurs. 2002. PMID: 12421396 Review.
-
Access to medical records for the purposes of medical audit.BMJ. 1993 Apr 3;306(6882):896-7. BMJ. 1993. PMID: 11643122 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Reconsidering 'ethics' and 'quality' in healthcare research: the case for an iterative ethical paradigm.BMC Med Ethics. 2015 May 8;16:21. doi: 10.1186/s12910-015-0004-1. BMC Med Ethics. 2015. PMID: 25952678 Free PMC article.
-
Rethinking research ethics.Am J Bioeth. 2010 Oct;10(10):19-36. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2010.519233. Am J Bioeth. 2010. PMID: 20945264
Cited by
-
Can we evaluate population screening strategies in UK general practice? A pilot randomised controlled trial comparing postal and opportunistic screening for genital chlamydial infection.J Epidemiol Community Health. 2005 Mar;59(3):198-204. doi: 10.1136/jech.2004.021584. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2005. PMID: 15709078 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Opt-out as an acceptable method of obtaining consent in medical research: a short report.BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011 Apr 6;11:40. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-11-40. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011. PMID: 21470399 Free PMC article.
-
Building an Opt-Out Model for Service-Level Consent in the Context of New Data Regulations.Public Health Ethics. 2022 Jan 11;15(2):175-180. doi: 10.1093/phe/phab030. eCollection 2022 Jul. Public Health Ethics. 2022. PMID: 36479559 Free PMC article.
-
The ethics of unlinked anonymous testing of blood: views from in-depth interviews with key informants in four countries.BMJ Open. 2012 Dec 20;2(6):e001427. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001427. Print 2012. BMJ Open. 2012. PMID: 23263019 Free PMC article.
-
Sorry, You Can't Have That Information: Data Holder Confusion Regarding Privacy Requirements for Personal Health Information and the Potential Chilling Effect on Health Research.Healthc Policy. 2009 May;4(4):61-76. Healthc Policy. 2009. PMID: 20436810 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources