Valuing snorkeling visits to the Florida Keys with stated and revealed preference models
- PMID: 12357661
- DOI: 10.1006/jema.2002.0552
Valuing snorkeling visits to the Florida Keys with stated and revealed preference models
Abstract
Coastal coral reefs, especially in the Florida Keys, are declining at a disturbing rate. Marine ecologists and reef scientists have emphasized the importance of establishing nonmarket values of coral reefs to assess the cost effectiveness of coral reef management and remediation programs. The purpose of this paper is to develop a travel cost-contingent valuation model of demand for trips to the Florida Keys focusing on willingness to pay (WTP) to preserve the current water quality and health of the coral reefs. The stated and revealed preference models allow the marginal valuation of recreationists to adjust depending on current and planned trip commitments in valuing nonmarginal policy changes in recreational opportunities. The integrated model incorporates key factors for establishing baseline amenity values for tourist dive sites, including perceptions of reef quality and dive conditions, the role of substitute sites, and the quality and availability of tourist facilities and recreation opportunities. The travel cost and WTP model differ in identifying critical variables and provide insight into the adjustment of trip decisions across alternative destination sites and the valuation of trips. In contrast to the travel cost model, a measure of the availability of substitute sites and total recreation activities does not have a significant impact on WTP valuations reported by snorkelers. Snorkelers engage in a relatively focused set of activities, suggesting that these recreationists may not shift expenditures to other sites or other recreation activities in the Florida Keys when confronted with increased access costs for the snorkeling experience.
Similar articles
-
Application of non-market valuation to the Florida Keys marine reserve management.J Environ Manage. 2003 Apr;67(4):315-25. doi: 10.1016/s0301-4797(02)00207-4. J Environ Manage. 2003. PMID: 12710920
-
Benthic community structure on coral reefs exposed to intensive recreational snorkeling.PLoS One. 2017 Sep 5;12(9):e0184175. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0184175. eCollection 2017. PLoS One. 2017. PMID: 28873449 Free PMC article.
-
Valuing coral reefs: a travel cost analysis of the Great Barrier Reef.Ambio. 2003 Aug;32(5):353-7. doi: 10.1579/0044-7447-32.5.353. Ambio. 2003. PMID: 14571965
-
Coral reefs: threats and conservation in an era of global change.Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2009 Apr;1162:136-86. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04493.x. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2009. PMID: 19432648 Review.
-
What can South African reefs tell us about the future of high-latitude coral systems?Mar Pollut Bull. 2018 Nov;136:491-507. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2018.09.014. Epub 2018 Oct 1. Mar Pollut Bull. 2018. PMID: 30509834 Review.
Cited by
-
Quantifying and valuing potential climate change impacts on coral reefs in the United States: comparison of two scenarios.PLoS One. 2013 Dec 31;8(12):e82579. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0082579. eCollection 2013. PLoS One. 2013. PMID: 24391717 Free PMC article.
-
Coastal business perception of coral value and payment for coral restoration.Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 18;15(1):9285. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-93439-x. Sci Rep. 2025. PMID: 40102617 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical