Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2002 Oct;12(10):1540-8.
doi: 10.1101/gr.153002.

Inferring domain-domain interactions from protein-protein interactions

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Inferring domain-domain interactions from protein-protein interactions

Minghua Deng et al. Genome Res. 2002 Oct.

Abstract

The interaction between proteins is one of the most important features of protein functions. Behind protein-protein interactions there are protein domains interacting physically with one another to perform the necessary functions. Therefore, understanding protein interactions at the domain level gives a global view of the protein interaction network, and possibly of protein functions. Two research groups used yeast two-hybrid assays to generate 5719 interactions between proteins of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. This allows us to study the large-scale conserved patterns of interactions between protein domains. Using evolutionarily conserved domains defined in a protein-domain database called PFAM (http://PFAM.wustl.edu), we apply a Maximum Likelihood Estimation method to infer interacting domains that are consistent with the observed protein-protein interactions. We estimate the probabilities of interactions between every pair of domains and measure the accuracies of our predictions at the protein level. Using the inferred domain-domain interactions, we predict interactions between proteins. Our predicted protein-protein interactions have a significant overlap with the protein-protein interactions (MIPS: http://mips.gfs.de) obtained by methods other than the two-hybrid assays. The mean correlation coefficient of the gene expression profiles for our predicted interaction pairs is significantly higher than that for random pairs. Our method has shown robustness in analyzing incomplete data sets and dealing with various experimental errors. We found several novel protein-protein interactions such as RPS0A interacting with APG17 and TAF40 interacting with SPT3, which are consistent with the functions of the proteins.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Comparison of specificity and sensitivity of the prediction rates for the association method and the maximum likelihood method.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Comparison of specificity and sensitivity of the prediction of protein–protein interactions by the maximum likelihood method for four different values of fp and fn.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Distributions of the pairwise correlation coefficients of gene expression profiles for interaction proteins in all gene pairs, the predicted interactions with threshold, the combined Uetz and Ito data, and the MIPS data.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bairoch A, Apweiler R. The SWISSPROT protein sequence database and its supplement TrEMBL in 2000. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000;28:45–48. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bateman A, Birney E, Cerruti L, Durbin R, Etwiller L, Eddy S, Griffiths-Jones S, Howe K, Marshall M, Sonnhammer E. The PFAM Protein Families Database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002;30:276–280. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bock JR, Gough DA. Predicting protein–protein interactions from primary structure. Bioinformatics. 2001;17:455–460. - PubMed
    1. Corpett F, Gouzy J, Kahn D. ProDom and ProDom-CG: Tools for protein domain analysis and whole genome comparisons. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000;28:267–269. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dempster AP, Laid NM, Rubin DB. Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm (with discussion) J Roy Statist Soc Ser B. 1977;39:1–38.

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances