Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2002 Oct;43(10):1339-42.

Focal tracer uptake: a potential artifact in contrast-enhanced dual-modality PET/CT scans

Gerald Antoch  1 , Lutz S Freudenberg, Thomas Egelhof, Jörg Stattaus, Walter Jentzen, Jörg F Debatin, Andreas Bockisch
Affiliations
  • PMID: 12368372
Free article

Focal tracer uptake: a potential artifact in contrast-enhanced dual-modality PET/CT scans

Gerald Antoch et al. J Nucl Med. 2002 Oct.
Free article

Abstract

This study was performed to evaluate a possible artifact related to the administration of intravascular contrast agent in dual-modality PET/CT imaging.

Methods: Thirty oncology patients underwent whole-body PET/CT. CT images, which were collected in the presence of intravenous and oral iodinated contrast agent, were used for PET attenuation correction. PET images were assessed for the artifact, defined as a region of high count rate on attenuation-corrected images in accurate coregistration with a contrast-enhanced blood vessel. Intravascular enhancement of thoracic veins was quantified by application of regions of interest, and quantities in patients with the artifact (group 1) and without the artifact (group 2) were correlated. Body surface area was calculated for all patients.

Results: The contrast-induced PET artifact was present in 4 (13%) of 30 patients. Mean density differences in intravascular enhancement were highly significant (P < 0.001) in a comparison of group 1 (2,262 +/- 304 Hounsfield units [HU]) and group 2 (1,058 +/- 209 HU). Body surface area was significantly lower (P = 0.035) in the patients of group 1 (1.67 +/- 0.11 m(2)) than in the patients of group 2 (2.01 +/- 0.18 m(2)).

Conclusion: Contrast-enhanced dual-modality PET/CT examinations may result in a PET artifact that is due to the transient bolus passage of undiluted intravenous contrast agent.

PubMed Disclaimer