The effects of psychotomimetics and psychomotor stimulants on two schedules promoting response switching in the rat
- PMID: 12373438
- DOI: 10.1007/s00213-002-1184-1
The effects of psychotomimetics and psychomotor stimulants on two schedules promoting response switching in the rat
Abstract
Rationale: Psychosis and psychotomimetic drugs result in a disorganisation of the structure of thought and behaviour. Normalising these is one of the objects of antipsychotic therapy, and methods for predicting such a therapeutic effect would be of value.
Objective: The effects of a number of psychotomimetic agents were examined on the way in which rats distributed responding over two response levers using two different procedures, to assay their effects on behavioural organisation. Previously, amphetamine has been found to increase response switching using these schedules.
Methods: In the first, the random reinforcement procedure, one of the two levers was selected at random as "correct", and responses on this lever were reinforced with food under a random ratio schedule. No signal was given to distinguish the levers. Responding could also result in the food tray being illuminated, but no food pellet was delivered ("no-food" event). Responses on the second lever ("incorrect") had no programmed consequences. After each food delivery or "no-food" event the levers designated as "correct" and "incorrect" were reassigned at random, and the rat had to open the food tray to restart the schedule. In the second procedure, the rats were required to make 21 responses before a switch between the two levers resulted in food delivery [Fixed Ratio (FR) 21-switch]. The responses making up the FR could be distributed freely between the two levers.
Results: Phencyclidine (PCP), scopolamine, caffeine and ethanol increased switching under the random reinforcement procedure, but (+/-)-2,5-dimethoxy-4-iodoamphetamine hydrochloride (DOI) and atropine did not. PCP, caffeine, lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) and atropine increased switching under the FR21-switch procedure, but ethanol did not. The increases in switching produced by PCP, LSD and the anticholinergics were accompanied by marked reductions in response rate, whereas those produced by amphetamine and caffeine were not. The effects of amphetamine, and PCP were strongly dependent on the baseline probability of switching, those of atropine and caffeine moderately so, and those of LSD and ethanol only weakly so.
Conclusions: Of the agents tested, psychomotor stimulants appear to produce the most selective increases in switching. The procedures described here may be useful for assaying the disorganisation of behaviour produced by other psychotomimetics and may have value in the detection of novel antipsychotic drugs.
Similar articles
-
The effects of psychotomimetic and putative cognitive-enhancing drugs on the performance of a n-back working memory task in rats.Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2009 Jan;202(1-3):67-78. doi: 10.1007/s00213-008-1314-5. Epub 2008 Sep 30. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2009. PMID: 18825373
-
Quantifying the molecular structure of behavior: separate effects of caffeine, cocaine, and adenosine agonists on interresponse times and lever-press durations.Behav Pharmacol. 1997 Feb;8(1):1-16. Behav Pharmacol. 1997. PMID: 9832996
-
Effects of d-amphetamine, monomethoxyamphetamines and hallucinogens on schedule-controlled behavior.J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1978 Jan;204(1):103-17. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1978. PMID: 619124
-
A pharmacological analysis of processes underlying differential responding: a review and further experiments with scopolamine, amphetamine, lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD-25), chlordiazepoxide, physostigmine, and chlorpromazine.Behav Biol. 1976 Sep;18(1):1-74. doi: 10.1016/s0091-6773(76)91764-8. Behav Biol. 1976. PMID: 791242 Review. No abstract available.
-
The behavioral and neurochemical effects of phencyclidine in humans and animals: some implications for modeling psychosis.Behav Brain Res. 1996 Jan;74(1-2):45-55. doi: 10.1016/0166-4328(95)00162-x. Behav Brain Res. 1996. PMID: 8851914 Review.
Cited by
-
Impulsive responding on the peak-interval procedure.Behav Processes. 2007 Feb 22;74(2):198-208. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2006.08.009. Epub 2006 Oct 4. Behav Processes. 2007. PMID: 17023122 Free PMC article.
-
Delay aversion but preference for large and rare rewards in two choice tasks: implications for the measurement of self-control parameters.BMC Neurosci. 2006 Jun 23;7:52. doi: 10.1186/1471-2202-7-52. BMC Neurosci. 2006. PMID: 16796752 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources