Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2002 Oct;9(8):775-84.
doi: 10.1007/BF02574500.

Outcome of ratio of lymph node metastasis in gastric carcinoma

Affiliations

Outcome of ratio of lymph node metastasis in gastric carcinoma

Etsuro Bando et al. Ann Surg Oncol. 2002 Oct.

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study was to clarify the outcome of the ratio of the metastatic lymph nodes (RML) in gastric cancer patients.

Methods: The postoperative survival of 650 patients with gastric cancer who underwent D2 curative gastrectomy was analyzed with regard to the RML. The location, number, and RML in the N1 station and in all (N1 and N2) stations were analyzed. These data were compared from the viewpoints of staging accuracy and patient survival.

Results: The RML was classified as follows: RML 0, no involvement; RML 1, 0 to.1; RML 2,.1 to.25; and RML 3, >or=.25. The 5-year survival rates stratified by RML were RML 0, 86%; RML 1, 68%; RML 2, 35%; and RML 3, 16%. Cox model identified all methods of classifying lymph node metastases as independent prognostic indicators in each calculation. However, a second Cox regression revealed that RML was the only independent prognostic factor among the three methods (P <.001). Stage migration was present in 35 cases (15%) when the number was considered. However, only 15 cases (7%) were underdiagnosed when RML was used.

Conclusions: RML is a useful classification of patients with gastric cancer. It may prevent the phenomenon of stage migration.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources