Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2002 Oct;25(10):447-54.
doi: 10.1002/clc.4960251003.

Anticoagulants for atrial fibrillation: why is the treatment rate so low?

Affiliations
Review

Anticoagulants for atrial fibrillation: why is the treatment rate so low?

Thomas A Buckingham et al. Clin Cardiol. 2002 Oct.

Abstract

The incidence of atrial fibrillation (AF) is increasing in many countries along with aging demographics. Atrial fibrillation is clearly associated with an increased rate of stroke. Numerous large clinical trials have shown that dose-adjusted warfarin can reduce the stroke rate in these patients, particularly in the elderly, and clear guidelines for the use of anticoagulants in such patients have been published. However, many studies show that treatment rates remain disappointingly low (< or = 50%). Numerous barriers to the use of dose-adjusted warfarin exist, including practical, patient-, physician-, and healthcare system-related barriers. These include the complex pharmacokinetics of warfarin, the need for continuous prothrombin time monitoring and dose adjustments, bleeding events, noncompliance, drug interactions, and increased costs of monitoring and therapy. Possible solutions to this problem are discussed and include improved patient and physician education, the use of anticoagulation clinics, new approaches to AF, and potential treatment improvements through use of newer anticoagulants.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Wolf PA, Abbott RD, Kannel WB: Atrial fibrillation as an independent risk factor for stroke: The Framingham Study. Stroke 1991; 22: 983–988 - PubMed
    1. Connolly SJ, Laupacis A, Gent M, Roberts RS, Cairns JA, Joyner C: Canadian Atrial Fibrillation Anticoagulation (CAFA) Study. J Am Coll Cardiol 1991; 18: 349–355 - PubMed
    1. EAFT (European Atrial Fibrillation Trial) Study Group : Secondary prevention in non‐rheumatic atrial fibrillation after transient ischaemic attack or minor stroke. Lancet 1993; 342: 1255–1262 - PubMed
    1. Ezekowitz MD, Bridgers SL, James KE, Carliner NH, Colling CL, Gornick CC, Krause‐Steinrauf H, Kurtzke JF, Nazarian SM, Radford MJ, Riclkel FR, Shabetai R, Deykin D, for the Veterans Affairs Stroke Prevention in Nonrheumatic Atrial Fibrillation Investigators : Warfarin in the prevention of stroke associated with non‐rheumatic atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 1992; 327: 1406–1412 - PubMed
    1. Petersen P, Boysen G, Godtfredsen J, Andersen ED, Andersen B: Placebo‐controlled, randomised trial of warfarin and aspirin for prevention of thromboembolic complications in chronic atrial fibrillation. The Copenhagen AFASAK study. Lancet 1989; 1: 175–179 - PubMed