Prospective cohort study of routine use of risk assessment scales for prediction of pressure ulcers
- PMID: 12376437
- PMCID: PMC128943
- DOI: 10.1136/bmj.325.7368.797
Prospective cohort study of routine use of risk assessment scales for prediction of pressure ulcers
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate whether risk assessment scales can be used to identify patients who are likely to get pressure ulcers.
Design: Prospective cohort study.
Setting: Two large hospitals in the Netherlands.
Participants: 1229 patients admitted to the surgical, internal, neurological, or geriatric wards between January 1999 and June 2000.
Main outcome measure: Occurrence of a pressure ulcer of grade 2 or worse while in hospital.
Results: 135 patients developed pressure ulcers during four weeks after admission. The weekly incidence of patients with pressure ulcers was 6.2% (95% confidence interval 5.2% to 7.2%). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.56 (0.51 to 0.61) for the Norton scale, 0.55 (0.49 to 0.60) for the Braden scale, and 0.61 (0.56 to 0.66) for the Waterlow scale; the areas for the subpopulation, excluding patients who received preventive measures without developing pressure ulcers and excluding surgical patients, were 0.71 (0.65 to 0.77), 0.71 (0.64 to 0.78), and 0.68 (0.61 to 0.74), respectively. In this subpopulation, using the recommended cut-off points, the positive predictive value was 7.0% for the Norton, 7.8% for the Braden, and 5.3% for the Waterlow scale.
Conclusion: Although risk assessment scales predict the occurrence of pressure ulcers to some extent, routine use of these scales leads to inefficient use of preventive measures. An accurate risk assessment scale based on prospectively gathered data should be developed.
Figures
Comment in
-
Risk assessment scales poorly predict pressure ulceration.BMJ. 2003 Jan 18;326(7381):165. doi: 10.1136/bmj.326.7381.165/a. BMJ. 2003. PMID: 12531859 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Health Council of the Netherlands. Pressure ulcers. The Hague: Health Council of the Netherlands; 1999. . (Publication No 1999/23.)
-
- Bours GJJW, Halfens RJG, Joosten CMC. Landelijk prevalentieonderzoek decubitus: uitgebreide resultaten tweede jaarlijkse meting 1999. [National pressure ulcer prevalence survey: extensive results from the second national pressure ulcer prevalence survey in 1999]. Maastricht: Department of Nursing Science, University of Maastricht; 1999. . (In Dutch.)
-
- Clark M, Farrar S. Comparison of pressure sore risk calculators. In: Harding KG, Leaper DL, editors. Proceedings of the first European conference on advances in wound management, 1991, Cardiff, United Kingdom. London: Macmillan; 1991. pp. 158–162.
-
- Panel for the prediction and prevention of pressure ulcers in adults. Pressure ulcers in adults: prediction and prevention. Rockville: Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, Public Health Service, US Department of Health and Human Services; 1992. . (Clinical practice guideline number 3; AHCPR Publication No 92-0047.)
-
- Goodridge DM, Sloan JA, LeDoyen YM, McKenzie JA, Knight WE, Gayari M. Risk-assessment scores, prevention strategies, and the incidence of pressure ulcers among the elderly in four Canadian health-care facilities. Can J Nurs Res. 1998;30:23–44. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical