Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2002 Nov;61(11):986-93.
doi: 10.1136/ard.61.11.986.

Measuring the meaning of disability in rheumatoid arthritis: the Personal Impact Health Assessment Questionnaire (PI HAQ)

S Hewlett  1 , A P Smith, J R Kirwan
Affiliations

Measuring the meaning of disability in rheumatoid arthritis: the Personal Impact Health Assessment Questionnaire (PI HAQ)

S Hewlett et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2002 Nov.

Abstract

Background: Measurement of disability in rheumatoid arthritis is often used to support treatment decisions and outcome assessments, but is used without reference to the impact of disability on individual patients.

Objective: To develop and validate a scale to measure individual values for functions, which is used to weight the level of an individual patient's functional loss and thus calculate the personal impact of disability.

Methods: In four linked studies, first the phraseology for values was explored to develop a stem question for the value scale couched in terms patients understand (face validity). Then short and long versions of the value scale were compared (content validity) and tests of internal consistency and short term reliability undertaken (criterion validity). Finally, the value scale was examined for long term reliability and agreement with expected variables (criterion and construct validity), after which personal impact scores were calculated and their construct validity examined.

Results: Patients understand the concept of values, and a positively phrased stem question was developed for the value scale, for which a short version was reasonably equivalent to a long version. The value scale was reliable over one week (96% changed by <1 point) with positive interitem correlation. Reasonable six and 12 month reliability was shown (52% changed by <0.5 points), and the value scale was independent of disability and clinical, psychological, personality, and social support variables. Personal impact scores were then calculated by using the value scores to weight disability scores. Impact scores varied widely between patients of similar disability. Personal impact for disability showed convergent validity with dissatisfaction with disability, perceived increase in disability, increased disease activity, worse psychological status, low social support, and time trade off for disability. It discriminated between patients with low and high dissatisfaction with disability, life satisfaction, depression, pain, and helplessness.

Conclusion: This individualised personal impact scale should lend meaning to disability scores, improving the interpretation of clinical and research data.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Percentage difference of eight domain and 20 ADL scales plotted against mean percentage scores of both scales (n=45).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Disability and personal impact for patients with low and high disability (study 4).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. J Pers Assess. 1985 Feb;49(1):71-5 - PubMed
    1. J Rheumatol. 1992 Jul;19(7):1031-7 - PubMed
    1. Arthritis Care Res. 1995 Jun;8(2):94-101 - PubMed
    1. J Rheumatol. 1987 Aug;14(4):710-7 - PubMed
    1. Arthritis Rheum. 1989 May;32(5):531-7 - PubMed

Publication types