Influence of combined intravenous and topical antibiotic prophylaxis on the incidence of infections, organ dysfunctions, and mortality in critically ill surgical patients: a prospective, stratified, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial
- PMID: 12379544
- DOI: 10.1164/rccm.2105141
Influence of combined intravenous and topical antibiotic prophylaxis on the incidence of infections, organ dysfunctions, and mortality in critically ill surgical patients: a prospective, stratified, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial
Abstract
We prospectively studied the impact of an antibiotic prophylaxis regimen on the incidence of infections, organ dysfunctions, and mortality in a predominantly surgical and trauma intensive care unit (ICU) population. A total of 546 patients were enrolled and stratified according to Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE)-II scores. They were then randomized to receive either 2 x 400 mg of intravenous ciprofloxacin for 4 days, together with a mixture of topical gentamicin and polymyxin applied to the nostrils, mouth, and stomach throughout their ICU stay or to receive intravenous and topical placebo. When receiving prophylaxis, significantly fewer patients acquired infections (p = 0.001, risk ratio [RR], 0.477; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.367-0.620), especially pneumonias (6 versus 29, p = 0.007), other lower respiratory tract infections (39 versus 70, p = 0.007), bloodstream infections (14 versus 36, p = 0.007), or urinary tract infections (36 versus 60, p = 0.042). Also, significantly fewer patients acquired severe organ dysfunctions (63 versus 96 patients, p = 0.0051; RR, 0.636; 95% CI, 0.463-0.874), especially renal dysfunctions (17 versus 38; p = 0.018). Within 5 days after admission, 24 patients died in each group, whereas 28 patients receiving prophylaxis and 51 receiving placebo died in the ICU thereafter (p = 0.0589; RR, 0.640; 95% CI, 0.402-1.017). The overall ICU mortality was not statistically different (52 versus 75 fatalities), but the mortality was significantly reduced for 237 patients of the midrange stratum with APACHE-II scores of 20-29 on admission (20 versus 38 fatalities, p = 0.0147; RR, 0.508; 95% CI, 0.295-0.875); there was still a favorable trend after 1 year (51 versus 60 fatalities; p = 0.0844; RR, 0.720; 95% CI, 0.496-1.046). Surveillance cultures from tracheobronchial, oropharyngeal, and gastric secretions and from rectal swabs did not show any evidence for the selection of resistant microorganisms in the patients receiving prophylaxis.
Comment in
-
In defense of evidence: the continuing saga of selective decontamination of the digestive tract.Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002 Oct 15;166(8):1014-5. doi: 10.1164/rccm.2207006. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002. PMID: 12379539 No abstract available.
-
Systemic plus topical antibiotic prophylaxis reduced acquired infections and organ dysfunction in critically ill adults.ACP J Club. 2003 Jul-Aug;139(1):6. ACP J Club. 2003. PMID: 12841710 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Short-term decline in all-cause acquired infections with the routine use of a decontamination regimen combining topical polymyxin, tobramycin, and amphotericin B with mupirocin and chlorhexidine in the ICU: a single-center experience.Crit Care Med. 2014 May;42(5):1121-30. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000140. Crit Care Med. 2014. PMID: 24365857
-
A controlled trial in intensive care units of selective decontamination of the digestive tract with nonabsorbable antibiotics. The French Study Group on Selective Decontamination of the Digestive Tract.N Engl J Med. 1992 Feb 27;326(9):594-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199202273260903. N Engl J Med. 1992. PMID: 1734249 Clinical Trial.
-
Evaluation of risk factors for mortality in intensive care units: a prospective study from a referral hospital in Turkey.Am J Infect Control. 2005 Feb;33(1):42-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2004.09.005. Am J Infect Control. 2005. PMID: 15685134
-
Selective oropharyngeal decontamination versus selective digestive decontamination in critically ill patients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Drug Des Devel Ther. 2015 Jul 14;9:3617-24. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S84587. eCollection 2015. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2015. PMID: 26203227 Free PMC article. Review.
-
[Selective decontamination of the digestive tract reduces mortality in intensive care patients].Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1999 Mar 20;143(12):602-6. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1999. PMID: 10321285 Review. Dutch.
Cited by
-
[Prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up care of sepsis. First revision of the S2k Guidelines of the German Sepsis Society (DSG) and the German Interdisciplinary Association for Intensive and Emergency Care Medicine (DIVI)].Anaesthesist. 2010 Apr;59(4):347-70. doi: 10.1007/s00101-010-1719-5. Anaesthesist. 2010. PMID: 20414762 German. No abstract available.
-
[Selective intestinal decontamination in intensive care. Reduction inpatient mortality without an increase in resistant pathogens].Anaesthesist. 2004 Jul;53(7):651-2. doi: 10.1007/s00101-004-0681-5. Anaesthesist. 2004. PMID: 15098096 German. No abstract available.
-
Colistin resistance in gram-negative bacteria during prophylactic topical colistin use in intensive care units.Intensive Care Med. 2013 Apr;39(4):653-60. doi: 10.1007/s00134-012-2761-3. Epub 2012 Dec 1. Intensive Care Med. 2013. PMID: 23203301
-
Probiotics versus antibiotic decontamination of the digestive tract: infection and mortality.Intensive Care Med. 2011 Jan;37(1):110-7. doi: 10.1007/s00134-010-2002-6. Epub 2010 Aug 19. Intensive Care Med. 2011. PMID: 20721536 Free PMC article.
-
[Diagnosis and therapy of sepsis].Clin Res Cardiol. 2006 Aug;95(8):429-54. doi: 10.1007/s00392-006-0414-7. Clin Res Cardiol. 2006. PMID: 16868790 Review. German.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical