Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2002 Oct 19;325(7369):873.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.325.7369.873.

Patients' decisions about whether or not to take antihypertensive drugs: qualitative study

John Benson  1 , Nicky Britten
Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Patients' decisions about whether or not to take antihypertensive drugs: qualitative study

John Benson et al. BMJ. .

Abstract

Objective: To describe the ways in which patients taking antihypertensive drugs balance reservations against reasons for taking them.

Design: Qualitative study using detailed interviews.

Setting: Two urban general practices in the United Kingdom.

Participants: Maximum variety sample of 38 interviewees receiving repeat prescriptions for antihypertensives.

Main outcome measures: Interviewees' reservations about drugs and reasons for taking antihypertensives.

Results: Patients had reservations about drugs generally and reservations about antihypertensives specifically. Reasons for taking antihypertensive drugs comprised positive experiences with doctors, perceived benefits of medication, and pragmatic considerations. Patients weighed their reservations against reasons for taking antihypertensives in a way that made sense for them personally. Some individual patients weighed different reservations against different reasons for taking antihypertensives.

Conclusions: Patients' ideas may derive from considerations unrelated to the drugs' pharmacology. Doctors who want their patients to make well informed choices about antihypertensives and to reach concordant decisions about prescribing should explore how individuals strike this balance, to personalise discussion of drug use.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

    1. Luscher TF, Vetter H, Siegenthaler W, Vetter W. Compliance in hypertension: facts and concepts. J Hypertens Suppl. 1985;3:S3–S9. - PubMed
    1. Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain Working Party. Partnership in medicine taking: a consultative document. London: Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain and Mercke Sharpe and Dohme; 1996.
    1. Conrad P. The meaning of medications: another look at compliance. Soc Sci Med. 1985;20:29–37. - PubMed
    1. Britten N. Patients' ideas about medicines: a qualitative study in a general practice population. Br J Gen Pract. 1994;44:465–468. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Svensson S, Kjellgren KI, Ahlner J, Saljo R. Reasons for adherence with antihypertensive medication. Int J Cardiol. 2000;76:157–163. - PubMed

Publication types

Substances