Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2002 Oct 19;325(7369):877-80.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.325.7369.877.

Efficacy of case method learning in general practice for secondary prevention in patients with coronary artery disease: randomised controlled study

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Efficacy of case method learning in general practice for secondary prevention in patients with coronary artery disease: randomised controlled study

Anna Kiessling et al. BMJ. .

Abstract

Objective: To study the efficacy of case method learning, for general practitioners, on patients' lipid concentrations in the secondary prevention of coronary artery disease.

Design: Prospective controlled trial.

Setting: Södertälje, Stockholm County, Sweden.

Participants: 255 consecutive patients with coronary artery disease.

Intervention: Guidelines were mailed to all general practitioners (n=54) and presented at a common lecture. General practitioners who were randomised to the intervention group participated in recurrent case method learning dialogues at their primary healthcare centres during a two year period. A locally well known cardiologist served as a facilitator.

Main outcome measure: Concentration of low density lipoprotein cholesterol at baseline and after two years. Analysis according to intention to treat (intervention and control groups (n=88)) was based on group affiliation at baseline.

Results: Low density lipoprotein cholesterol was reduced by 0.5 mmol/l (95% confidence interval 0.2 to 0.8 mmol/l) (9.3% (2.9% to 15.8%)) from baseline in patients in the intervention group and by 0.5 (0.1 to 0.9) mmol/l compared with controls (P<0.05). No change occurred in the control group (0.0 (-0.2 to 0.2) mmol/l). Low density lipoprotein cholesterol decreased by 0.6 (0.4 to 0.8) mmol/l in a group of patients who received specialist care.

Conclusion: Case method learning resulted in a lowering of low density lipoprotein cholesterol in the primary care patients with coronary artery disease comparable to that achieved at a specialist clinic. Conventional presentation of practice guidelines had no effect.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure
Figure
Cause-effect diagram illustrating the clinical decision making process integrating scientific evidence (what) with the concrete and abstract components of clinical practice

References

    1. Randomised trial of cholesterol lowering in 4444 patients with coronary heart disease: the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S) Lancet. 1994;344:1383–1389. - PubMed
    1. EUROASPIRE I and II Group. Clinical reality of coronary prevention guidelines: a comparison of EUROASPIRE I and II in nine countries. Lancet. 2001;357:995–1001. - PubMed
    1. Grimshaw JM, Russell IT. Effect of clinical guidelines on medical practice: a systematic review of rigorous evaluations. Lancet. 1993;342:1317–1322. - PubMed
    1. Lomas J, Anderson GM, Domnick-Pierre K, Vayda E, Enkin MW, Hannah WJ. Do practice guidelines guide practice? The effect of a consensus statement on the practice of physicians. N Engl J Med. 1989;321:1306–1311. - PubMed
    1. Dowie J. The research-practice gap and the role of decision analysis in closing it. Health Care Anal. 1996;4:5–18. - PubMed

Publication types

Substances