Stability of maxillary advancement using rigid fixation and porous-block hydroxyapatite grafting: cleft palate versus non-cleft patients
- PMID: 12387610
Stability of maxillary advancement using rigid fixation and porous-block hydroxyapatite grafting: cleft palate versus non-cleft patients
Abstract
This study was undertaken to evaluate the stability of maxillary advancement using bone plates for skeletal stabilization and porous block hydroxyapatite (PBHA) as a bone graft substitute for interpositional grafting in cleft and non-cleft patients. The records of 74 patients (41 females, 33 males) who underwent Le Fort I maxillary advancement using rigid fixation and PBHA interpositional grafting were evaluated retrospectively. All patients also underwent simultaneous sagittal split mandibular ramus osteotomies. Patients were divided into 2 groups for study purposes: group 1 consisted of 17 cleft palate patients and group 2 consisted of 57 non-cleft patients. Each group was further subdivided into 2 subgroups based on the concurrent vertical positioning of the maxillary incisors: groups 1a and 2a, where the maxilla underwent 3 mm or more of inferior repositioning, and groups 1b and 2b, where the maxilla underwent minimal vertical change (< or = 1 mm). Presurgery, immediate postsurgery, and longest follow-up lateral cephalometric tracings were superimposed and analyzed to calculate surgical change and long-term stability of results by assessing horizontal and vertical changes at point A, incisor superius, and the mesial cusp tip of maxillary first molar. The average follow-up time in group 1 was 37.9 months (range 12 to 136) and in group 2 was 28.77 months (range 17 to 88). Average maxillary advancement at point A was: group 1a, 5.4 mm; group 1b, 5.25 mm; group 2a, 5.48 mm; group 2b, 5.46 mm. Average relapse at point A was: group 1a, -0.75 mm; group 1b, -1 mm; group 2a, -0.47 mm; group 2b, -0.48 mm. Average horizontal and/or vertical relapse at the central incisors and first molars was 1 mm or less in group 1 and less than 0.5 mm in group 2. Although there was a slightly greater relapse in group 1, no statistically significant difference was observed between the groups. Maxillary advancement with Le Fort 1 osteotomies using rigid fixation and interpositional PBHA grafting during bimaxillary surgery is a stable procedure with good predictability in cleft and non-cleft patients, regardless of the direction of vertical maxillary movement.
Similar articles
-
Stability of skeletal Class III malocclusion after combined maxillary and mandibular procedures.Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg. 2001 Fall;16(3):179-92. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg. 2001. PMID: 12387609
-
Stability of the Le Fort I osteotomy for maxillary advancement using rigid fixation and porous block hydroxyapatite grafting.Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2002 Jul;94(1):18-23. doi: 10.1067/moe.2002.126076. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2002. PMID: 12193888
-
Stability after rigid fixation of simultaneous maxillary impaction and mandibular advancement osteotomies.Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003 Apr;32(2):137-42. doi: 10.1054/ijom.2002.0315. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003. PMID: 12729772
-
Long-term skeletal stability after maxillary advancement with distraction osteogenesis using a rigid external distraction device in cleft maxillary deformities.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004 Nov;114(6):1382-92; discussion 1393-4. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000138593.89303.1b. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004. PMID: 15509923 Review.
-
Maxillary advancement with conventional orthognathic surgery in patients with cleft lip and palate: is it a stable technique?J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012 Dec;70(12):2859-66. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2012.03.009. Epub 2012 Jun 6. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012. PMID: 22677329
Cited by
-
Distraction Osteogenesis Versus Orthognathic Surgery: Demystifying Differences in Concepts, Techniques and Outcomes.J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2020 Dec;19(4):477-489. doi: 10.1007/s12663-020-01414-y. Epub 2020 Jul 21. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2020. PMID: 33071493 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Three-Dimensional Outcome Assessments of Surgical Correction in Cleft and Noncleft Patients with Class III Skeletal Relation: A Case-Control Study.Biomed Res Int. 2021 Aug 13;2021:4572397. doi: 10.1155/2021/4572397. eCollection 2021. Biomed Res Int. 2021. PMID: 34435043 Free PMC article.
-
Long-term skeletal stability after maxillary advancement with distraction osteogenesis in cleft lip and palate patients.Angle Orthod. 2012 Nov;82(6):1115-22. doi: 10.2319/011212-27.1. Epub 2012 Apr 12. Angle Orthod. 2012. PMID: 22506512 Free PMC article. Review.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Other Literature Sources
Medical