Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2002 Nov;87(5):438-43.
doi: 10.1136/adc.87.5.438.

The use of nasal continuous positive airway pressure to treat obstructive sleep apnoea

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

The use of nasal continuous positive airway pressure to treat obstructive sleep apnoea

F Massa et al. Arch Dis Child. 2002 Nov.

Abstract

Aim: To review 66 children with obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) for whom a trial of nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) was proposed.

Methods: Baseline sleep studies were performed to assess OSA severity; a trial of nCPAP was performed where moderate to severe OSA, not relieved by adenotonsillectomy, was found. The nCPAP trial was considered either technically successful (ST), if the child accepted the mask for sufficient time to determine nCPAP efficacy, or a technical failure (FT) if otherwise. Patients with an initial FT were offered a period of home acclimatisation to familiarise them with wearing the mask during sleep. ST patients in whom nCPAP was effective were established on long term therapy.

Results: Nasal CPAP trials were successful (ST) in 49/66 (74%) patients. Nasal CPAP efficacy could not be determined in the remaining 17 FT patients (26%), generally because of their poor nCPAP tolerance. These patients were subsequently considered for other treatment. A total of 42/49 (86%) ST patients were established on long term nCPAP therapy, 2/49 (4%) derived no benefit from nCPAP, while 5/49 (10%) refused long term nCPAP therapy. Of patients on long term nCPAP, the most frequently reported side effects were skin irritation and nasal dryness; however, these were not serious enough to require any patients to discontinue therapy. A period of home acclimatisation was found to be effective in increasing nCPAP acceptance, with 26% of FT children being subsequently successfully reassessed for nCPAP.

Conclusion: The use of nCPAP was feasible in a significant proportion of a paediatric OSA population. Failure was usually because of the child's intolerance of the nCPAP equipment. Nasal CPAP was an effective treatment in the majority of patients where it could be assessed, and was adopted as a long term therapy in most cases. We have successfully used nCPAP to treat OSA across a wide range of ages. Motivated parents and skilled support staff have proved essential for the success of nCPAP in a paediatric setting.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
An infant undergoing a sleep study with nasal CPAP. The CPAP mask consists a rigid plastic frame with a soft silicone nasal cushion. The mask is held in place over the nose by a set of headgear with a three-point fixing to the mask frame using adjustable Velcro straps. The CPAP pressure is applied from a flow generator located at the cot side (out of picture) via the corrugated tubing, seen to the patient's right. Mask pressure is monitored during the CPAP trial via the narrow manometer tubing connected to the CPAP mask. The respiband monitoring respiratory movements is evident round the chest, an oximeter probe is attached to the right foot, and the ECG leads can be seen exiting from the child's clothes.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Flow diagram showing the history of 66 patients with OSA in which an nCPAP trial was suggested. The outlined boxes indicate the patients that were established on nCPAP therapy at home. For children that failed to be treated with nCPAP, alternative treatments such as nasopharyngeal prong, supplemental oxygen, and craniofacial surgery were used. One child underwent tracheostomy for acute respiratory failure and was subsequently ventilated with BiPAP via tracheostomy. One child underwent adenotonsillectomy after a period of stabilisation with CPAP.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Number of children with successful nCPAP trials (ST) and with failed trials (FT), broken down by the age at outset of their nCPAP trial. Percentages represent success rate for each age group.

References

    1. Curr Opin Pulm Med. 1997 Nov;3(6):464-9 - PubMed
    1. Childs Nerv Syst. 1996 Nov;12(11):713-9 - PubMed
    1. Pediatr Pulmonol Suppl. 1999;18:188-9 - PubMed
    1. Chest. 1999 Jul;116(1):10-6 - PubMed
    1. Ear Nose Throat J. 1999 Oct;78(10):776-8, 781-2, 784-90 - PubMed

Publication types