Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2002 Oct 15;30(6):374-80.
doi: 10.1016/s0212-6567(02)79050-1.

[Pulse pressure as a marker of cardiovascular risk among the elderly]

[Article in Spanish]
Affiliations

[Pulse pressure as a marker of cardiovascular risk among the elderly]

[Article in Spanish]
R Villa Estébanez et al. Aten Primaria. .

Abstract

Objective: To verify the clinical significance and the prognostic value of taking the pulse in the general elderly population.

Design: Transversal descriptive study between June and October 2000 within primary care.Participants. A simple randomised sample of 415 people was obtained from the population aged 60 or over (n=8,026) from sixteen lists of six health centres in Asturias.

Main measurements: Demographic variables and cardiovascular risk factors were analysed and the presence of associated cardiovascular pathology was investigated. The analysis divided blood pressure at the pulse into terciles.

Results: 338 people (18.5% losses), with an average age of 73+/-7, 64% of whom were women, were included. The SP and DP means were 140+/-18 and 80+/-8 mm Hg, respectively. The pulse pressure terciles were: tercile 1, (3/4)51 mm Hg, tercile 2, 52-65 mm Hg and tercile 3, >=66 mm Hg. Those in tercile 3 were older than those in tercile 1 (P<.001) and had higher SP figures (P<.001). Tercile 3 was linked to greater prevalence of Hypertension, isolated systolic hypertension and worse control of hypertension; and also to greater prevalence of ischaemic cardiopathy (P=.018) and of overall cardiovascular pathology (P=.005). After logistical regression analysis, pulse pressure persisted as an independent variable (P=.017).

Conclusions: Among the elderly as a whole, blood pressure at the pulse is an independent marker of cardiovascular risk.

Objetivo: Verificar el significado clínico y el valor pronóstico de la presión de pulso en población general anciana.

Diseño: Estudio descriptivo transversal realizado entre junio y octubre de 2000, en el ámbito de atención primaria.

Participantes: De la población de edad 3 60 años (n = 8.026) de 16 cupos de seis centros de salud de Asturias se obtuvo una muestra aleatoria simple de 415 personas.

Mediciones principales: Se analizaron variables demográficas y factores de riesgo cardiovascular y se investigó la presencia de patología cardiovascular asociada. El análisis se realizó mediante la división en terciles de la presión de pulso.

Resultados: Se incluyó a 338 personas (18,5% de pérdidas), con una edad media de 73 ± 7 años; el 64% eran mujeres. Las medias de la presión arterial sistólica (PAS) y diastólica (PAD) fueron 140 ± 18 y 80 ± 8 mmHg, respectivamente. Los terciles de presión de pulso fueron: tercil 1, £ 51 mmHg; tercil 2, 52–65 mmHg, y tercil 3, 3 66 mmHg. En relación con el tercil 1, los del tercil 3 son más viejos (p < 0,001) y presentan cifras de PAS más elevadas (p < 0,001). El tercil 3 se asocia con mayor prevalencia de hipertensión arterial, hipertensión sistólica aislada y peor control de la hipertensión, así como con una mayor prevalencia de cardiopatía isquémica (p = 0,018) y de patología cardiovascular global (p = 0,005). Tras el análisis de regresión logística la presión de pulso persistió como variable independiente (p = 0,017).

Conclusiones: En población general anciana la presión de pulso es un marcador de riesgo cardiovascular independiente.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Franklin S.S., Gustin W I.V., Wong N.D., Larson M.G., Weber M.A., Kannel W.B. Hemodynamic patterns of age. Related changes in blood pressure. Circulation. 1997;96:308–315. - PubMed
    1. Wang J.G., Staessen J.A. Benefits of antihypertensive drug treatment in elderly patients isolated systolic hypertension. Neth J Med. 2001;58:248–254. - PubMed
    1. Pocock S.J., McCormarck V., Gueyffier F., Boutitie F., Fagard R.H., Boig C. A score for predicting risk of death from cardiovascular disease adults with raised blood pressusre, based on individual patient from randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 2001;323:75–81. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Burt V.L., Whelton P., Rocella E.J., Brown C., Cutler J.A., Higgins M. Prevalence of hypertension in the US adult population: results from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988–1991. Hypertension. 1995;25:305–313. - PubMed
    1. Burt V.L., Cutler J.A., Higgins M., Horan M.J., Labarthe D., Whelton P. Trends in the prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension in the adults US population: data from the health examination surveys, 1960 to 1991. Hypertension. 1995;26:60–69. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources