Anterior repression of a Drosophila stripe enhancer requires three position-specific mechanisms
- PMID: 12397102
- DOI: 10.1242/dev.129.21.4931
Anterior repression of a Drosophila stripe enhancer requires three position-specific mechanisms
Abstract
The striped expression pattern of the pair-rule gene even skipped (eve) is established by five stripe-specific enhancers, each of which responds in a unique way to gradients of positional information in the early Drosophila embryo. The enhancer for eve stripe 2 (eve 2) is directly activated by the morphogens Bicoid (Bcd) and Hunchback (Hb). As these proteins are distributed throughout the anterior half of the embryo, formation of a single stripe requires that enhancer activation is prevented in all nuclei anterior to the stripe 2 position. The gap gene giant (gt) is involved in a repression mechanism that sets the anterior stripe border, but genetic removal of gt (or deletion of Gt-binding sites) causes stripe expansion only in the anterior subregion that lies adjacent to the stripe border. We identify a well-conserved sequence repeat, (GTTT)(4), which is required for repression in a more anterior subregion. This site is bound specifically by Sloppy-paired 1 (Slp1), which is expressed in a gap gene-like anterior domain. Ectopic Slp1 activity is sufficient for repression of stripe 2 of the endogenous eve gene, but is not required, suggesting that it is redundant with other anterior factors. Further genetic analysis suggests that the (GTTT)(4)-mediated mechanism is independent of the Gt-mediated mechanism that sets the anterior stripe border, and suggests that a third mechanism, downregulation of Bcd activity by Torso, prevents activation near the anterior tip. Thus, three distinct mechanisms are required for anterior repression of a single eve enhancer, each in a specific position. Ectopic Slp1 also represses eve stripes 1 and 3 to varying degrees, and the eve 1 and eve 3+7 enhancers each contain GTTT repeats similar to the site in the eve 2 enhancer. These results suggest a common mechanism for preventing anterior activation of three different eve enhancers.
Similar articles
-
Functional analysis of eve stripe 2 enhancer evolution in Drosophila: rules governing conservation and change.Development. 1998 Mar;125(5):949-58. doi: 10.1242/dev.125.5.949. Development. 1998. PMID: 9449677
-
Two distinct mechanisms for differential positioning of gene expression borders involving the Drosophila gap protein giant.Development. 1998 Oct;125(19):3765-74. doi: 10.1242/dev.125.19.3765. Development. 1998. PMID: 9729485
-
The eve stripe 2 enhancer employs multiple modes of transcriptional synergy.Development. 1996 Jan;122(1):205-14. doi: 10.1242/dev.122.1.205. Development. 1996. PMID: 8565831
-
Hunchback is counter-repressed to regulate even-skipped stripe 2 expression in Drosophila embryos.PLoS Genet. 2018 Sep 7;14(9):e1007644. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1007644. eCollection 2018 Sep. PLoS Genet. 2018. PMID: 30192762 Free PMC article.
-
Mechanism of eve stripe formation.Mech Dev. 1995 Jan;49(1-2):133-58. doi: 10.1016/0925-4773(94)00310-j. Mech Dev. 1995. PMID: 7748785 Review.
Cited by
-
Thermodynamics-based models of transcriptional regulation by enhancers: the roles of synergistic activation, cooperative binding and short-range repression.PLoS Comput Biol. 2010 Sep 16;6(9):e1000935. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000935. PLoS Comput Biol. 2010. PMID: 20862354 Free PMC article.
-
The cis-regulatory logic underlying abdominal Hox-mediated repression versus activation of regulatory elements in Drosophila.Dev Biol. 2019 Jan 15;445(2):226-236. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2018.11.006. Epub 2018 Nov 20. Dev Biol. 2019. PMID: 30468713 Free PMC article.
-
Computing away the magic?Elife. 2013 Aug 6;2:e01135. doi: 10.7554/eLife.01135. Elife. 2013. PMID: 23930226 Free PMC article.
-
Consequences of eukaryotic enhancer architecture for gene expression dynamics, development, and fitness.PLoS Genet. 2011 Nov;7(11):e1002364. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002364. Epub 2011 Nov 10. PLoS Genet. 2011. PMID: 22102826 Free PMC article.
-
The role of binding site cluster strength in Bicoid-dependent patterning in Drosophila.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Apr 5;102(14):4960-5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0500373102. Epub 2005 Mar 25. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005. PMID: 15793007 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Molecular Biology Databases
Research Materials
Miscellaneous