Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2002 Oct 26;325(7370):925.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.325.7370.925.

Interventions used in disease management programmes for patients with chronic illness-which ones work? Meta-analysis of published reports

Affiliations
Review

Interventions used in disease management programmes for patients with chronic illness-which ones work? Meta-analysis of published reports

Scott R Weingarten et al. BMJ. .

Abstract

Objective: To systematically evaluate the published evidence regarding the characteristics and effectiveness of disease management programmes.

Design: Meta-analysis.

Data sources: Computerised databases for English language articles during 1987-2001.

Study selection: 102 articles evaluating 118 disease management programmes.

Main outcome measures: Pooled effect sizes calculated with a random effects model.

Results: Patient education was the most commonly used intervention (92/118 programmes), followed by education of healthcare providers (47/118) and provider feedback (32/118). Most programmes (70/118) used more than one intervention. Provider education, feedback, and reminders were associated with significant improvements in provider adherence to guidelines (effect sizes (95% confidence intervals) 0.44 (0.19 to 0.68), 0.61 (0.28 to 0.93), and 0.52 (0.35 to 0.69) respectively) and with significant improvements in patient disease control (effect sizes 0.35 (0.19 to 0.51), 0.17 (0.10 to 0.25), and 0.22 (0.1 to 0.37) respectively). Patient education, reminders, and financial incentives were all associated with improvements in patient disease control (effect sizes 0.24 (0.07 to 0.40), 0.27 (0.17 to 0.36), and 0.40 (0.26 to 0.54) respectively).

Conclusions: All studied interventions were associated with improvements in provider adherence to practice guidelines and disease control. The type and number of interventions varied greatly, and future studies should directly compare different types of intervention to find the most effective.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure
Figure
Selection process for including studies in systematic review

Comment in

References

    1. Smith DH, Malone DC, Lawson KA, Okamoto LJ, Battista C, Saunders WB. A national estimate of the economic costs of asthma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1997;156:787–793. - PubMed
    1. Greenberg PE, Stiglin LE, Finkelstein SN, Berndt ER. The economic burden of depression in 1990. J Clin Psychiatry. 1993;54:405–418. - PubMed
    1. American Diabetes Association. Economic consequences of diabetes mellitus in the US in 1997. Diabetes Care. 1998;21:296–309. - PubMed
    1. Ellrodt G, Cook DJ, Lee J, Cho M, Hunt D, Weingarten S. Evidence-based disease management. JAMA. 1997;278:1687–1692. - PubMed
    1. Epstein WA, Sanchez M, Kechijian P. Conjunctivitis. Arch Dermatol. 1985;121:838. - PubMed