Hospital and surgeon procedure volume as predictors of outcome following rectal cancer resection
- PMID: 12409664
- PMCID: PMC1422616
- DOI: 10.1097/00000658-200211000-00008
Hospital and surgeon procedure volume as predictors of outcome following rectal cancer resection
Abstract
Objective: To compare surgeon and hospital procedure volume as predictors of outcomes for patients with rectal cancer.
Summary background data: Although a "volume-outcome" relationship exists for several major cancer operations, the impact of procedure volume on outcomes following rectal cancer surgery remains uncertain, and it has not been determined whether hospital or surgeon volume is a more important predictor of outcomes.
Methods: A retrospective population-based cohort study utilizing the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER)-Medicare linked database identified 2,815 rectal cancer patients aged 65 and older who had surgery for a primary tumor diagnosed in 1992-1996 in a SEER area. Hospital- and surgeon-specific procedure volume was ascertained based on the number of claims submitted over the 5-year study period. Outcome measures were mortality at 30 days and 2 years, overall survival, and the rate of abdominoperineal resections. Age, sex, race, comorbid illness, cancer stage, and socioeconomic status were used to adjust for differences in case mix.
Results: Neither hospital- nor surgeon-specific procedure volume was significantly associated with 30-day postoperative mortality or rates of rectal sphincter-sparing operations. Although an association between hospital volume and mortality at 2 years was evident, this finding was no longer significant once surgeon-specific volume was controlled for. In contrast, surgeon-specific volume was associated with 2-year mortality and remained an important predictor even after adjustment for hospital volume. Surgeon volume was also better than hospital procedure volume at predicting long-term survival.
Conclusions: Surgeon-specific experience as measured by procedure volume can have a significant impact on survival for patients with rectal cancer.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Surgeon volume compared to hospital volume as a predictor of outcome following primary colon cancer resection.J Surg Oncol. 2003 Jun;83(2):68-78; discussion 78-9. doi: 10.1002/jso.10244. J Surg Oncol. 2003. PMID: 12772198
-
Associations between hospital and surgeon procedure volumes and patient outcomes after ovarian cancer resection.J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006 Feb 1;98(3):163-71. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djj018. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006. PMID: 16449676
-
Influence of hospital procedure volume on outcomes following surgery for colon cancer.JAMA. 2000 Dec 20;284(23):3028-35. doi: 10.1001/jama.284.23.3028. JAMA. 2000. PMID: 11122590
-
The surgeon as a prognostic factor in the surgical treatment of rectal cancer.Surg Oncol. 2007 Dec;16 Suppl 1:S53-6. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2007.10.009. Epub 2007 Nov 26. Surg Oncol. 2007. PMID: 18023175 Review.
-
Rectal cancer surgery: volume-outcome analysis.Int J Colorectal Dis. 2010 Dec;25(12):1389-96. doi: 10.1007/s00384-010-1019-1. Epub 2010 Jul 27. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2010. PMID: 20661600 Review.
Cited by
-
Evolving role of neoadjuvant therapy in rectal cancer.Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2013 Sep;14(3):350-64. doi: 10.1007/s11864-013-0242-8. Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2013. PMID: 23828092
-
Factors associated with use of preoperative chemoradiation therapy for rectal cancer in the Cancer Care Outcomes Research and Surveillance Consortium.Am J Clin Oncol. 2013 Dec;36(6):572-9. doi: 10.1097/COC.0b013e318261082b. Am J Clin Oncol. 2013. PMID: 22992624 Free PMC article.
-
Socio-demographic and other patient characteristics associated with time between colonoscopy and surgery, and choice of treatment centre for colorectal cancer: a retrospective cohort study.BMJ Open. 2012 May 26;2(3):e001070. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001070. Print 2012. BMJ Open. 2012. PMID: 22637491 Free PMC article.
-
Collaboration Between Surgeons and Medical Oncologists and Outcomes for Patients With Stage III Colon Cancer.J Oncol Pract. 2015 May;11(3):e388-97. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2014.003293. Epub 2015 Apr 14. J Oncol Pract. 2015. PMID: 25873063 Free PMC article.
-
Surgeon volume plays a significant role in outcomes and cost following open incisional hernia repair.J Gastrointest Surg. 2015 Jan;19(1):100-10; discussion 110. doi: 10.1007/s11605-014-2627-9. Epub 2014 Aug 14. J Gastrointest Surg. 2015. PMID: 25118644
References
-
- Hermanek P, Hohenberger W. The importance of volume in colorectal cancer surgery. Eur J Surg Oncol 1996; 22: 213–215. - PubMed
-
- Holm T, Johansson H, Cedermark B, et al. Influence of hospital- and surgeon-related factors on outcome after treatment of rectal cancer with or without preoperative radiotherapy. Br J Surg 1997; 84: 657–663. - PubMed
-
- Board NCP. Interpreting the volume–outcome relationship in the context of cancer care, Vol. 2001: http://www-iom.edu, 2001.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources