Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2002 Nov;9(6):1235-9.
doi: 10.1128/cdli.9.6.1235-1239.2002.

Use of coefficient of variation in assessing variability of quantitative assays

Affiliations

Use of coefficient of variation in assessing variability of quantitative assays

George F Reed et al. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 2002 Nov.

Erratum in

  • Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 2003 Nov;10(6):1162

Abstract

We have derived the mathematical relationship between the coefficient of variation associated with repeated measurements from quantitative assays and the expected fraction of pairs of those measurements that differ by at least some given factor, i.e., the expected frequency of disparate results that are due to assay variability rather than true differences. Knowledge of this frequency helps determine what magnitudes of differences can be expected by chance alone when the particular coefficient of variation is in effect. This frequency is an operational index of variability in the sense that it indicates the probability of observing a particular disparity between two measurements under the assumption that they measure the same quantity. Thus the frequency or probability becomes the basis for assessing if an assay is sufficiently precise. This assessment also provides a standard for determining if two assay results for the same subject, separated by an intervention such as vaccination or infection, differ by more than expected from the variation of the assay, thus indicating an intervention effect. Data from an international collaborative study are used to illustrate the application of this proposed interpretation of the coefficient of variation, and they also provide support for the assumptions used in the mathematical derivation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.
Nomogram for relating the CV to the probability that two assay measurements from the same analyte sample will differ by a factor k or more.

References

    1. Karpinski, K. F., S. Hayward, and H. Tryphonsa. 1987. Statistical considerations in the quantitation of serum immunoglobulin levels using the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). J. Immunol. Methods 103:189-194. - PubMed
    1. Lindgren, B. W. 1960. Statistical theory. Macmillan, New York, N.Y.
    1. Lynn, F., G. F. Reed, and B. D. Meade. 1996. Collaborative study for the evaluation of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays used to measure human antibodies to Bordetella pertussis antigens. Clin. Diagn. Lab. Immunol. 3:689-700. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wood, R. J. 1981. Alternative ways of estimating serological titer reproducibility. J. Clin. Microbiol. 13:760-768. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wood, R. J., and T. M. Durham. 1980. Reproducibility of serological titers. J. Clin. Microbiol. 11:541-545. - PMC - PubMed