Comparison of molecular and biological characteristics of a modified live porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) vaccine (ingelvac PRRS MLV), the parent strain of the vaccine (ATCC VR2332), ATCC VR2385, and two recent field isolates of PRRSV
- PMID: 12414926
- PMCID: PMC136866
- DOI: 10.1128/jvi.76.23.11837-11844.2002
Comparison of molecular and biological characteristics of a modified live porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) vaccine (ingelvac PRRS MLV), the parent strain of the vaccine (ATCC VR2332), ATCC VR2385, and two recent field isolates of PRRSV
Abstract
The objectives of this study were to compare the molecular and biological characteristics of recent porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) field isolates to those of a modified live virus (MLV) PRRS vaccine and its parent strain. One hundred seventeen, 4-week-old pigs were randomly assigned to six groups. Group 1 (n = 20) served as sham-inoculated negative controls, group 2 (n = 19) was inoculated with Ingelvac PRRS MLV vaccine, group 3 (n = 20) was inoculated with the parent strain of the vaccine (ATCC VR2332), group 4 (n = 19) was inoculated with vaccine-like PRRSV field isolate 98-38803, group 5 (n = 19) was inoculated with PRRSV field isolate 98-37120, and group 6 (n = 20) was inoculated with known high-virulence PRRSV isolate ATCC VR2385. The levels of severity of gross lung lesions (0 to 100%) among the groups were significantly different at both 10 (P < 0.0001) and 28 days postinoculation (p.i.) (P = 0.002). At 10 days p.i., VR2332 (26.5% +/- 4.64%) and VR2385 (36.4% +/- 6.51%) induced gross lesions of significantly greater severity than 98-38803 (0.0% +/- 0.0%), 98-37120 (0.8% +/- 0.42%), Ingelvac PRRS MLV (0.9% +/- 0.46%), and negative controls (2.3% +/- 1.26%). At 28 days p.i., 98-37120 (17.2% +/- 6.51%) induced gross lesions of significantly greater severity than any of the other viruses. Analyses of the microscopic-interstitial-pneumonia-lesion scores (0 to 6) revealed that VR2332 (2.9 +/- 0.23) and VR2385 (3.1 +/- 0.35) induced significantly more severe lesions at 10 days p.i. At 28 days p.i., VR2385 (2.5 +/- 0.27), VR2332 (2.3 +/- 0.21), 98-38803 (2.6 +/- 0.29), and 98-37120 (3.0 +/- 0.41) induced significantly more severe lesions than Ingelvac PRRS MLV (0.7 +/- 0.17) and controls (0.7 +/- 0.15). The molecular analyses and biological characterizations suggest that the vaccine-like isolate 98-38803 (99.5% amino acid homology based on the ORF5 gene) induces microscopic pneumonia lesions similar in type to, but different in severity and time of onset from, those observed with virulent strains VR2385 and the parent strain of the vaccine. Our data strongly suggest that isolate 98-38803 is a derivative of Ingelvac PRRS MLV and that the isolate is pneumovirulent.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Development of a heteroduplex mobility assay to identify field isolates of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus with nucleotide sequences closely related to those of modified live-attenuated vaccines.J Clin Microbiol. 2003 Jun;41(6):2433-9. doi: 10.1128/JCM.41.6.2433-2439.2003. J Clin Microbiol. 2003. PMID: 12791860 Free PMC article.
-
Cell-mediated immune response and protective efficacy of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus modified-live vaccines against co-challenge with PRRSV-1 and PRRSV-2.Sci Rep. 2020 Feb 3;10(1):1649. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-58626-y. Sci Rep. 2020. PMID: 32015495 Free PMC article.
-
Immune responses and protection by vaccine and various vaccine adjuvant candidates to virulent porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus.Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 2006 Jan 15;109(1-2):99-115. doi: 10.1016/j.vetimm.2005.07.026. Epub 2005 Sep 13. Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 2006. PMID: 16165219 Clinical Trial.
-
Live porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus vaccines: Current status and future direction.Vaccine. 2015 Aug 7;33(33):4069-80. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.06.092. Epub 2015 Jul 4. Vaccine. 2015. PMID: 26148878 Review.
-
Recombination of Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus: Features, Possible Mechanisms, and Future Directions.Viruses. 2024 Jun 7;16(6):929. doi: 10.3390/v16060929. Viruses. 2024. PMID: 38932221 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Emergency vaccination alleviates highly pathogenic porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus infection after contact exposure.BMC Vet Res. 2013 Feb 9;9:26. doi: 10.1186/1746-6148-9-26. BMC Vet Res. 2013. PMID: 23394440 Free PMC article.
-
Immune responses in pigs induced by recombinant DNA vaccine co-expressing swine IL-18 and membrane protein of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus.Int J Mol Sci. 2012;13(5):5715-5728. doi: 10.3390/ijms13055715. Epub 2012 May 11. Int J Mol Sci. 2012. PMID: 22754326 Free PMC article.
-
Inhibition of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus replication by RNA interference in MARC-145 cells.Mol Biol Rep. 2012 Mar;39(3):2515-22. doi: 10.1007/s11033-011-1003-z. Epub 2011 Jun 12. Mol Biol Rep. 2012. PMID: 21667252
-
Generation of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus by in vitro assembly of viral genomic cDNA fragments.Virus Res. 2015 Jan 2;195:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2014.09.008. Epub 2014 Oct 6. Virus Res. 2015. PMID: 25300804 Free PMC article.
-
Enhanced humoral and cellular immune responses to PRRS virus GP5 glycoprotein by DNA prime-adenovirus boost vaccination in mice.Virus Genes. 2016 Apr;52(2):228-34. doi: 10.1007/s11262-016-1293-2. Epub 2016 Feb 2. Virus Genes. 2016. PMID: 26837895
References
-
- Allende, R., T. L. Lewis, Z. Lu, D. L. Rock, G. F. Kutish, A. Ali, A. R. Doster, and F. A. Osorio. 1999. North American and European porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome viruses differ in non-structural protein coding regions. J. Gen. Virol. 80:307-315. - PubMed
-
- Allende, R., G. F. Kutish, W. Laegreid, Z. Lu, T. L. Lewis, D. L. Rock, J. Friesen, J. A. Galeota, A. R. Doster, and F. A. Osorio. 2000. Mutations in the genome of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus responsible for the attenuation phenotype. Arch. Virol. 145:1149-1161. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Benson, J. E., M. J. Yaeger, and K. M. Lager. 2000. Effect of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) exposure dose on fetal infection in vaccinated and nonvaccinated swine. Swine Health Product. 8:155-160.
-
- Bøtner, A., B. Strandbygaard, K. J. Sørensen, P. Have, K. G. Madsen, E. S. Madsen, and S. Alexandersen. 1997. Appearance of acute PRRS-like symptoms in sows after vaccination with a modified live PRRS vaccine. Vet. Rec. 141:497-499. - PubMed
-
- Bush, E. J., B. Corso, J. Zimmerman, S. Swenson, D. Pyburn, and T. Burkgren. 1999. Update on the acute PRRS investigative study. Swine Health Product. 7:179-180.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
- Actions
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources