Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2002 Oct;19(10):451-5.
doi: 10.1023/a:1020302301326.

Ovarian response to gonadotropin stimulation in repeated IVF cycles after unilateral salpingectomy

Affiliations

Ovarian response to gonadotropin stimulation in repeated IVF cycles after unilateral salpingectomy

Joseph Tal et al. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2002 Oct.

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to examine ovarian response to gonadotrpoin stimulation after repeated IVF treatment cycles in patients who underwent previous unilateral salpingectomy for tubal pregnancy.

Methods: The study group included 26 patients who underwent unilateral salpingectomy for tubal pregnancy 1-9 years prior to starting IVF treatment. A control group of 52 patients with anatomically intact pelvis was treated during the same time period by ICSI. The two groups were matched for age, number of gonadotropin ampules, and length of stimulation. End point measurements included number of follicles, oocytes, and cleaved embryos in consecutive treatment cycles of each group.

Results: There were 98 cycles in the study group and 154 cycles in the control group. The mean number of follicles, retrieved oocytes, and cleaved embryos were not different in the two groups, and no reductions in these parameters were noted up to 10 cycles of treatment. The mean number of follicles ipsilateral to the operated side was similar to the number of follicles of the contralateral ovary and was not different whether salpingectomy was by laparoscopy or laparotomy.

Conclusions: Unilateral salpingectomy does not affect ipsilateral ovarian response to gonadotropin stimulation even after repeated IVF treatment cycles.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Zeyneloglu HB, Arici A, Olive DL. Adverse effects of hydrosalpinx on pregnancy rates after in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer. Fertil Steril. 1998;70(3):492–499. - PubMed
    1. Camus E, Poncelet C, Goffinet F, Wainer B, Merlet F, Nisad I, Philippe HJ. Pregnancy rates after in-vitro fertilization in cases of tubal infertility with and without hydrosalpinx: A meta-analysis of published comparative studies. Hum Reprd. 1999;14(5):1243–1249. - PubMed
    1. Strandell A, Lindhard A, Valderstrom U, Thorborn J, Janson PO, Hamberger L. Hydrosalpinx and IVF outcome:Aprospective, randomized multicenter trial in Scandinavia on salpingectomy prior to IVF. Hum Reprod. 1999;14(11):2762–2769. - PubMed
    1. Lass A, Ellenbogen A, Croucher C, Trew G, Margara R, Becattini C, Winston RML. Effect of salpingectomy on ovarian response to superovulation in an in vitro fertilization-embryo tranfer program. Fertil Steril. 1998;70(6):1035–1038. - PubMed
    1. Romeu A, Steingold K, Jones D, Acosta AA: Significance of bilateral salpingectomy in the outcome of IVF-ET (Abstract p159) Paper presented at fifth World Congress on In Vitro Fertilization and EmbryoTransfer, April 5-10, 1987, Norfolk, VA