Postpartum X-ray pelvimetry. Its use in calculating the fetal-pelvic index and predicting fetal-pelvic disproportion
- PMID: 12418069
Postpartum X-ray pelvimetry. Its use in calculating the fetal-pelvic index and predicting fetal-pelvic disproportion
Abstract
Objective: To determine whether postpartum x-ray pelvimetry can be used to calculate the fetal-pelvic index (FPI) in future pregnancies.
Study design: In stage I of the study, 10 gravid women, after 36 completed weeks' gestation, underwent x-ray pelvimetry before delivery. Pelvimetry was repeated within two days after delivery. Comparisons between antepartum and postpartum measurements were made using paired t tests and correlation coefficients. In stage II, 25 gravid women, after 36 completed weeks' gestation, underwent fetal ultrasound for biometry. X-ray pelvimetry was performed within two days after delivery. FPI was calculated for each pregnancy using antepartum fetal ultrasound and postpartum pelvimetry measurements. FPI calculations were correlated with the incidence of fetal-pelvic disproportion (FPD), as indicated by the requirement for cesarean section for arrest of active labor. Sensitivity, specificity and predictive value of FPI were assessed.
Results: In stage I, mean anteroposterior and transverse diameters of the pelvic inlet, midpelvis and pelvic outlet did not differ significantly. In stage II, the sensitivity of FPI for detecting FPD was 100%, specificity 95%, positive predictive value 80%, and negative predictive value 100%.
Conclusion: Postpartum pelvimetry has the same association with FPD as antepartum pelvimetry. The strategy of using postpartum pelvimetry and antepartum fetal biometry to calculate FPI successfully identified 100% of the patients who ultimately required cesarean section for FPD, with a false positive rate of 5%. Pelvimetry performed postpartum in an index pregnancy may be used in future pregnancies, in combination with antepartum fetal ultrasound, to calculate FPI and predict the likelihood of FPD.
Similar articles
-
The magnetic resonance imaging-based fetal-pelvic index: a pilot study in the community hospital.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Jun;190(6):1679-85; discussion 1685-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.02.044. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004. PMID: 15284768
-
Magnetic resonance-based serial pelvimetry: do maternal pelvic dimensions change during pregnancy?Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Jun;194(6):1689-94; discussion 1694-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.03.008. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006. PMID: 16731086
-
[Methods, techniques and assessment criteria in obstetric pelvimetry].Z Geburtshilfe Perinatol. 1994 Mar-Apr;198(2):37-46. Z Geburtshilfe Perinatol. 1994. PMID: 8023529 Review. German.
-
The cephalopelvic disproportion index. Combined fetal sonography and x-ray pelvimetry for early detection of cephalopelvic disproportion.J Reprod Med. 1991 May;36(5):369-73. J Reprod Med. 1991. PMID: 2061886
-
[Is there a role for X-ray pelvimetry in the twenty-first century?].Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2007 Jan;35(1):6-12. doi: 10.1016/j.gyobfe.2006.09.028. Epub 2006 Dec 21. Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2007. PMID: 17188014 Review. French.
Cited by
-
Determining the Incidence of Gynecoid Pelvis Using Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography in Nonpregnant Multiparous Women.Med Princ Pract. 2016;25(1):40-8. doi: 10.1159/000440808. Epub 2015 Oct 16. Med Princ Pract. 2016. PMID: 26334957 Free PMC article.
-
Radiographic measures of the mid pelvis to predict cesarean delivery.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Jun;208(6):460.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.02.050. Epub 2013 Mar 1. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013. PMID: 23467050 Free PMC article.