Effective control of dental chair unit waterline biofilm and marked reduction of bacterial contamination of output water using two peroxide-based disinfectants
- PMID: 12419272
- DOI: 10.1053/jhin.2002.1282
Effective control of dental chair unit waterline biofilm and marked reduction of bacterial contamination of output water using two peroxide-based disinfectants
Abstract
Bacterial biofilm in dental unit waterlines (DUWs) is a widespread problem, and poses a potentially significant risk of infection to dental staff and patients, particularly those who are medically compromised or immunocompromised. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the level of bacterial contamination of dental chair unit output water in the Dublin Dental Hospital, and to investigate the efficacy of two hydrogen peroxide-based disinfectants in reducing bacterial loads to < or =200 cfu/mL as recommended by the American Dental Association. The chemical quality of dental chair unit input and output water was well within the limits recommended for potable water. Water supplied to the units yielded an average aerobic heterotrophic bacterial cell density of 184 cfu/mL. However, the corresponding density in output water was considerably higher; the average cell density in water from the three-in-one air/water syringes and cup fillers in 12 chairs was 8200 and 4300 cfu/mL, respectively. Dental unit water obtained from 18 separate reservoir-supplied units in general practices in the Dublin area yielded an average of 66000 cfu/mL. The bacterial species found were predominantly environmental organisms, which were also present at low levels in the input water. Some of the species identified (e.g., Burkholderia cepacia and Pseudomonas fluorescens) are known opportunistic pathogens. The capacity of two disinfectants, Sterilex Ultra and Sanosil, to reduce bacterial contamination to safe levels was compared. In a controlled study, once weekly overnight (15 h) disinfection using either agent reduced the bacterial density to below the American Dental Association recommended level of 200 cfu/mL. However, once disinfection ceased the bacterial loads increased to unacceptably high levels within three weeks. Electron microscopic analysis showed that both disinfectants markedly reduced biofilm in the DUWs, but the biofilm rapidly became extensive again when once weekly disinfection ceased. While both disinfectants were equally effective in lowering the bacterial counts to acceptable levels, Sterilex Ultra was associated with clogging of DUWs in some dental chair units after repeated usage, suggesting that Sanosil is a more suitable agent for routine use.
Copyright 2002 The Hospital Infection Society
Similar articles
-
A novel automated waterline cleaning system that facilitates effective and consistent control of microbial biofilm contamination of dental chair unit waterlines: a one-year study.J Dent. 2006 Oct;34(9):648-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2005.12.006. Epub 2006 Jan 24. J Dent. 2006. PMID: 16442201
-
Microbial biofilm formation in DUWS and their control using disinfectants.J Dent. 2007 Sep;35(9):721-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2007.07.005. Epub 2007 Aug 21. J Dent. 2007. PMID: 17714847 Review.
-
Comparison of the efficacies of disinfectants to control microbial contamination in dental unit water systems in general dental practices across the European Union.Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006 Feb;72(2):1380-7. doi: 10.1128/AEM.72.2.1380-1387.2006. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006. PMID: 16461690 Free PMC article.
-
A centralised, automated dental hospital water quality and biofilm management system using neutral Ecasol maintains dental unit waterline output at better than potable quality: a 2-year longitudinal study.J Dent. 2009 Oct;37(10):748-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2009.06.001. Epub 2009 Jun 11. J Dent. 2009. PMID: 19573971
-
Dental unit waterline management: historical perspectives and current trends.J Investig Clin Dent. 2012 Nov;3(4):247-52. doi: 10.1111/j.2041-1626.2012.00135.x. Epub 2012 Aug 27. J Investig Clin Dent. 2012. PMID: 22927105 Review.
Cited by
-
Dental unit waterline testing practices: an 11-Year retrospective study.BMC Oral Health. 2023 Nov 15;23(1):867. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03590-y. BMC Oral Health. 2023. PMID: 37968643 Free PMC article.
-
Microbiology, genomics, and clinical significance of the Pseudomonas fluorescens species complex, an unappreciated colonizer of humans.Clin Microbiol Rev. 2014 Oct;27(4):927-48. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00044-14. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2014. PMID: 25278578 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Comparison between Two Types of Dental Unit Waterlines: How Evaluation of Microbiological Contamination Can Support Risk Containment.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jan 24;16(3):328. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16030328. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019. PMID: 30682855 Free PMC article.
-
Potential of Carvacrol and Thymol in Reducing Biofilm Formation on Technical Surfaces.Molecules. 2021 May 6;26(9):2723. doi: 10.3390/molecules26092723. Molecules. 2021. PMID: 34066411 Free PMC article.
-
First water safety plan approach applied to a Dental Clinic complex: identification of new risk factors associated with Legionella and P. aeruginosa contamination, using a novel sampling, maintenance and management program.J Oral Microbiol. 2023 Jun 16;15(1):2223477. doi: 10.1080/20002297.2023.2223477. eCollection 2023. J Oral Microbiol. 2023. PMID: 37346998 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical