Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2002 Dec;61(12):1090-4.
doi: 10.1136/ard.61.12.1090.

Diagnostic associations in a large and consecutively identified population positive for anti-SSA and/or anti-SSB: the range of associated diseases differs according to the detailed serotype

Affiliations

Diagnostic associations in a large and consecutively identified population positive for anti-SSA and/or anti-SSB: the range of associated diseases differs according to the detailed serotype

I Peene et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2002 Dec.

Abstract

Objective: To determine the diagnostic distribution in a consecutive anti-SSA and/or anti-SSB positive population.

Methods: A total of 15 937 serum samples from 10 550 consecutive patients were analysed for antinuclear antibodies (ANAs) on HEp-2 cells. Serum samples positive for ANAs were analysed by immunodiffusion and line immunoassay with recombinant SSA-Ro52, natural SSA-Ro60, and recombinant SSB.

Results: Among ANA positive patients in whom clinical information was available, 181 consecutive patients with anti-SSA and/or anti-SSB antibodies were identified, Disease associations were systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) (45.3%), primary Sjögren's syndrome (pSS) (14.4%), scleroderma (8.8%), RA (7.7%), cutaneous lupus (7.7%), and dermatomyositis (2.2%). The ratio of diagnoses differed according to the anti-SSA/anti-SSB serotype. Scleroderma and dermatomyositis were enriched among mono-Ro52 reactive serum samples (34.2% and 10.5% respectively). Single reactivity towards Ro60 or anti-Ro60 with anti-Ro52 predisposed for SLE (80.0% and 52.2% respectively). Triple reactivity towards Ro52, Ro60, and SSB was primarily linked with SLE (55.8%) followed by pSS (20.9%). Anti-SSA on immunodiffusion increased the chance for SLE (62.8%), whereas isolated anti-SSB reactivity on immunodiffusion was less indicative for SLE (14.3%) and predisposed more for cutaneous lupus (23.8%) and pSS (33.3%).

Conclusion: The diagnostic range associated with anti-SSA or anti-SSB reactivity differs significantly according to the detailed serotype defined by line immunoassay and immunodiffusion.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Different combinations of reactivities towards Ro52, Ro60, and SSB defined by line immunoassay. Lane a: anti-Ro52 antibodies; lane b: anti-Ro60 antibodies; lane c: anti-SSB antibodies; lane d: anti-Ro52 and anti-Ro60 antibodies; lane e: anti-Ro60 and anti-SSB antibodies; lane f: anti-Ro52 and anti-SSB antibodies; lane g: anti-Ro52 and anti-Ro60 and anti-SSB antibodies.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ann Rheum Dis. 2001 Feb;60(2):116-23 - PubMed
    1. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 1999 Mar-Apr;17(2):205-14 - PubMed
    1. Ann Rheum Dis. 2001 Dec;60(12):1131-6 - PubMed
    1. Arthritis Rheum. 1980 May;23(5):581-90 - PubMed
    1. Arthritis Rheum. 1982 Nov;25(11):1271-7 - PubMed