[Informed consent and patient competence in the psychically ill. A review of empirical studies]
- PMID: 12430044
- DOI: 10.1007/s00115-002-1297-0
[Informed consent and patient competence in the psychically ill. A review of empirical studies]
Abstract
In clinical practice, patients' self-determination has become more and more important. However, in psychiatry, the practice of informed consent encompasses several problems. In many cases the psychiatrist is faced with the issue of determining patients' competence. This paper gives an overview of empirical studies on competence assessment in psychiatry. In the course of some of these studies, test instruments were developed which allow objective and reliable assessment of different standards of competence. The applicability of these tests is discussed. We present empirical data on the relationship between competence and psychopathologic symptoms and cognitive factors. In recent empirical research, a shift from an initial skepticism of the applicability of informed consent in psychiatry towards a more differentiated approach and an interest in multidisciplinary research can be observed.
Similar articles
-
The capacity to consent to treatment and research: a review of standardized assessment tools.Clin Psychol Rev. 2005 Nov;25(7):954-74. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2005.04.010. Clin Psychol Rev. 2005. PMID: 15964671 Review.
-
[Informed consent in psychiatry--European standards and differences, problems and recommendations].Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr. 1997 Jan;65(1):23-33. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-996306. Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr. 1997. PMID: 9132366 German.
-
[Self determination of patients in social psychiatric practice. A medical ethics model and its practical application].Psychiatr Prax. 1997 Jul;24(4):181-4. Psychiatr Prax. 1997. PMID: 9340657 German.
-
Reliability of clinical judgment of patients' competency to give informed consent: a case vignette study.Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2000 Apr;54(2):245-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1819.2000.00665.x. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2000. PMID: 10803822
-
Determining the competency of Alzheimer patients to consent to treatment and research.Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 1994;8 Suppl 4:5-18. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 1994. PMID: 7695856 Review.
Cited by
-
[Neuroethics--a future discipline?].Nervenarzt. 2006 Jan;77(1):5-11. doi: 10.1007/s00115-005-1895-8. Nervenarzt. 2006. PMID: 15806420 Review. German.
-
["But you know Mr. M., you won't get hospitalised" : A qualitative study on service users' experience of seeking psychiatric inpatient admission].Neuropsychiatr. 2019 Jun;33(2):98-106. doi: 10.1007/s40211-018-0297-7. Epub 2019 Jan 9. Neuropsychiatr. 2019. PMID: 30627985 German.
-
The cognitive based approach of capacity assessment in psychiatry: a philosophical critique of the MacCAT-T.Health Care Anal. 2004 Dec;12(4):273-83; discussion 265-72. doi: 10.1007/s10728-004-6635-x. Health Care Anal. 2004. PMID: 15658082 Review.
-
[Effects of a shared decision making model in psychiatric and neurologic practice].Nervenarzt. 2006 Sep;77(9):1071-6, 1078. doi: 10.1007/s00115-005-1950-5. Nervenarzt. 2006. PMID: 15954015 German.
-
Assisted dying requests from people in detention: Psychiatric, ethical, and legal considerations-A literature review.Front Psychiatry. 2022 Jul 29;13:909096. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.909096. eCollection 2022. Front Psychiatry. 2022. PMID: 35966491 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical