Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2002 Nov-Dec;27(6):612-7.
doi: 10.1053/rapm.2002.37122.

Postherniorrhaphy urinary retention--effect of local, regional, and general anesthesia: a review

Peter Jensen  1 , Trine Mikkelsen, Henrik Kehlet
Affiliations
Review

Postherniorrhaphy urinary retention--effect of local, regional, and general anesthesia: a review

Peter Jensen et al. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2002 Nov-Dec.

Abstract

Background and objectives: Postherniorrhaphy urinary retention (UR) may depend on the anesthetic technique. We therefore reviewed available published studies of UR in relation to anesthetic technique.

Methods: A Medline-based search (1966-November 2001) revealed 70 nonrandomized and 2 randomized studies.

Results: The incidence of UR was lower with local anesthesia (LA) (33 in 8991 patients, 0.37%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.24%-0.49%) compared with regional anesthesia (RA) (150 in 6191 patients, 2.42%, 95% CI 2.04%-2.81%) and general anesthesia (GA) (344 in 11471 patients, 3.00%, 95% CI 2.69%-3.31%).

Conclusion: The low incidence of UR with LA is in accordance with the inhibitory effects of RA and GA on bladder function. Data from newer short-acting techniques of GA and RA are required to define the optimal anesthetic for inguinal herniorrhaphy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Publication types