Aspects of scanning microdensitometry. III. The monochromator system
- PMID: 1243150
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2818.1975.tb04035.x
Aspects of scanning microdensitometry. III. The monochromator system
Abstract
Microdensitometric errors can result from various factors associated with the monochromator system, including imperfect monochromaticity of the light, incorrect setting of the wavelength, and non-uniform illumination of either the microscopic field or the objective aperture. Certain types of potential error are characteristic of particular instruments. Thus in the Vickers M85 microdensitometer, where the flying spot is the reduced image of a hole situated at the monochromator exit aperture, the interpretation of results obtained with different spot sizes is complicated by the fact that the hole size affects both the spatial resolution and the spectral bandwidth of the system. Similarly, in instruments in which the monochromator exit slit lies in an aperture plane the numerical aperture of the whole system may be affected by the spectral bandwidth and vice versa. Overall instrumental sensitivity is mainly limited at the blue and red ends of the spectrum respectively by the lamp output and the photomultiplier tube sensitivity. Quartz-iodine lamps are slightly brighter than conventional tungsten sources, especially at short wavelengths, but tend to be less stable photometrically and are more expensive. Simple refracting monochromators and graded-spectrum interference filters in general pass more light, in the visible spectrum, than do grating monochromators of similar bandwidth. Most errors of wavelength setting can be avoided by routinely measuring at that wavelength, lambda(max), found empirically to give the maximum absorbance or integrated absorbance. Off-peak wavelengths can be set reproducibly with the aid of an eyepiece spectroscope, or by adjusting the wavelength so that the absorbance of a given specimen is some precise fraction of that at lambda(max).
Similar articles
-
Random signal variation as a cause of systematic microdensitometric error.Cytometry. 1986 Nov;7(6):532-5. doi: 10.1002/cyto.990070606. Cytometry. 1986. PMID: 3780359
-
Dual-peak dose measurement for radiochromic films by a newly developed spectral microdensitometer.Med Phys. 2005 Jun;32(6):1485-90. doi: 10.1118/1.1914544. Med Phys. 2005. PMID: 16013704
-
[Calibration Method for the Monochromator Based on Continuous Spectrum Light Source].Guang Pu Xue Yu Guang Pu Fen Xi. 2015 Aug;35(8):2348-51. Guang Pu Xue Yu Guang Pu Fen Xi. 2015. PMID: 26672323 Chinese.
-
[Research on Small-Type and High-Spectral-Resolution Grating Monochromator].Guang Pu Xue Yu Guang Pu Fen Xi. 2016 Jan;36(1):273-8. Guang Pu Xue Yu Guang Pu Fen Xi. 2016. PMID: 27228781 Chinese.
-
Errors in microdensitometry.Histochem J. 1981 Mar;13(2):251-67. doi: 10.1007/BF01006883. Histochem J. 1981. PMID: 6166593 Review.
Cited by
-
A user's guide for avoiding errors in absorbance image cytometry: a review with original experimental observations.Histochem J. 1994 Jan;26(1):1-19. Histochem J. 1994. PMID: 7513318 Review.
-
Microdensitometric and autoradiographic comparison of the DNA contents of foetal and adult rat liver nuclei.Histochemistry. 1978 Feb 3;55(1):63-74. doi: 10.1007/BF00496695. Histochemistry. 1978. PMID: 640862 No abstract available.
-
Apparent anomalies in nuclear feulgen-DNA contents. Role of systematic microdensitometric errors.J Cell Biol. 1976 Oct;71(1):68-88. doi: 10.1083/jcb.71.1.68. J Cell Biol. 1976. PMID: 61968 Free PMC article.
-
Differential distribution of Fc gamma RIIIa in normal human tissues and co-localization with DAF and fibrillin-1: implications for immunological microenvironments.Immunology. 1998 May;94(1):56-63. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2567.1998.00491.x. Immunology. 1998. PMID: 9708187 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of temperature on morphology and DNA-content of polytene chromosomes in Drosophila.Chromosoma. 1979 Mar 12;71(3):333-46. doi: 10.1007/BF00287139. Chromosoma. 1979. PMID: 446243
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources