Potential for the use of elicitors of plant resistance in arthropod management programs
- PMID: 12432521
- DOI: 10.1002/arch.10066
Potential for the use of elicitors of plant resistance in arthropod management programs
Abstract
Plants protect themselves from arthropod herbivores both directly, by expressing biochemical and morphological traits that interfere with herbivore development or behavior, and indirectly, by facilitating the action of natural enemies of herbivores. These direct and indirect resistance mechanisms are not always expressed at maximal levels by plants, but rather can be induced to higher levels by a variety of stimuli, most notably prior herbivory. The recent discovery of chemical elicitors of induced responses has led to interest in manipulating the inducible responses of plants for crop protection. Applications of elicitors of induced responses made at appropriate times during the growing season of a crop have the potential of activating both direct and indirect mechanisms of plant resistance and thereby simultaneously augmenting host-plant resistance and biological control. This strategy may serve as an important component of a multifaceted, ecologically-based pest management program and is unlikely to precipitate the rapid evolution of countermeasures by target pests. However, this strategy will not be appropriate in all crops or against all arthropod pests. The conditions under which the use of an elicitor is likely to be successful are discussed, and examples of the successful use of elicitors are reviewed.
Copyright 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Similar articles
-
Induced plant defences in biological control of arthropod pests: a double-edged sword.Pest Manag Sci. 2017 Sep;73(9):1780-1788. doi: 10.1002/ps.4587. Epub 2017 Jun 8. Pest Manag Sci. 2017. PMID: 28387028 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Damaged-self recognition in plant herbivore defence.Trends Plant Sci. 2009 Jul;14(7):356-63. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2009.04.002. Epub 2009 Jun 17. Trends Plant Sci. 2009. PMID: 19540148
-
Mites for the control of pests in protected cultivation.Pest Manag Sci. 2007 Jul;63(7):658-76. doi: 10.1002/ps.1380. Pest Manag Sci. 2007. PMID: 17533640 Review.
-
Ecology of interactions between weeds and arthropods.Annu Rev Entomol. 2005;50:479-503. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ento.49.061802.123218. Annu Rev Entomol. 2005. PMID: 15822205 Review.
-
Early season herbivore differentially affects plant defence responses to subsequently colonizing herbivores and their abundance in the field.Mol Ecol. 2008 Jul;17(14):3352-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2008.03838.x. Epub 2008 Jun 28. Mol Ecol. 2008. PMID: 18565114
Cited by
-
Enhancing plant resistance at the seed stage: low concentrations of methyl jasmonate reduce the performance of the leaf miner Tuta absoluta but do not alter the behavior of its predator Chrysoperla externa.J Chem Ecol. 2014 Oct;40(10):1090-8. doi: 10.1007/s10886-014-0503-4. Epub 2014 Oct 16. J Chem Ecol. 2014. PMID: 25319361
-
Plant defense elicitors: plant fitness versus wheat stem sawfly.PeerJ. 2018 Nov 1;6:e5892. doi: 10.7717/peerj.5892. eCollection 2018. PeerJ. 2018. PMID: 30402358 Free PMC article.
-
Jasmonic acid biosynthesis by fungi: derivatives, first evidence on biochemical pathways and culture conditions for production.PeerJ. 2021 Feb 5;9:e10873. doi: 10.7717/peerj.10873. eCollection 2021. PeerJ. 2021. PMID: 33604199 Free PMC article.
-
The plant growth-promoting rhizobacterium Azospirillum brasilense reduces symptoms and aphid population growth on wheat plants infected with barley yellow dwarf virus.Proc Biol Sci. 2025 Feb;292(2041):20242857. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2024.2857. Epub 2025 Feb 19. Proc Biol Sci. 2025. PMID: 39968622
-
Induction of direct and indirect plant responses by jasmonic acid, low spider mite densities, or a combination of jasmonic acid treatment and spider mite infestation.J Chem Ecol. 2003 Dec;29(12):2651-66. doi: 10.1023/b:joec.0000008010.40606.b0. J Chem Ecol. 2003. PMID: 14969353
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources