Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2002 Nov 16;325(7373):1135.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.325.7373.1135.

Multicentre aneurysm screening study (MASS): cost effectiveness analysis of screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms based on four year results from randomised controlled trial

Multicentre Aneurysm Screening Study Group
Clinical Trial

Multicentre aneurysm screening study (MASS): cost effectiveness analysis of screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms based on four year results from randomised controlled trial

Multicentre Aneurysm Screening Study Group. BMJ. .

Abstract

Objective: To assess the cost effectiveness of ultrasound screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Design: Primary analysis: four year cost effectiveness analysis based directly on results from a randomised controlled trial in which patients were individually allocated to invitation to ultrasound screening (intervention) or to a control group not offered screening. Secondary analysis: projection of the data, based on conservative assumptions, to indicate likely cost effectiveness at 10 years.

Setting: Four centres in the United Kingdom. Screening delivered in primary care settings with follow up and surgery offered in the main hospitals Participants: Population based sample of 67 800 men aged 65-74 years.

Main outcome measures: Mortality from and costs (screening, follow up, elective and emergency surgery) related to abdominal aortic aneurysm; cost per life year gained.

Results: Over four years there were 47 fewer deaths related to abdominal aortic aneurysms in the screening group than in the control group, but the additional costs incurred were pound 2.2m. After adjustment for censoring and discounted at 6% the mean additional cost of the screening programme was pound 63.39 ($97.77, euro;100.48) (95% confidence interval pound 53.31 to pound 73.48) per patient. The hazard ratio for abdominal aortic aneurysm was 0.58 (0.42 to 0.78). Over four years the mean incremental cost effectiveness ratio for screening was pound 28 400 ( pound 15 000 to pound 146 000) per life year gained, equivalent to about pound 36 000 per quality adjusted life year. After 10 years this figure is estimated to fall to around pound 8000 per life year gained.

Conclusions: Even at four years the cost effectiveness of screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms is at the margin of acceptability according to current NHS thresholds. Over a longer period the cost effectiveness will improve substantially, the predicted ratio at 10 years falling to around a quarter of the four year figure.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Costs per six month period (C=control; I=intervention)
Figure 2
Figure 2
Mortality related to abdominal aortic aneurysms over four years of follow up by randomised group
Figure 3
Figure 3
Cost effectiveness acceptability curves (probability that screening is cost effective after four years plotted as function of sum willing to be paid per life year gained) for base case and key sensitivity analyses, based on four years of follow up
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

References

    1. Lindholt JS, Juul S, Fastin H, Henneberg EW. Hospital costs and benefits of screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms. Results from a randomised population screening trial. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2002;23:55–60. - PubMed
    1. Collin J. The value of screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm by ultrasound. In: Greenholgh RM, Mamaid JA, editors. The causes and management of aneurysms. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders; 1990. pp. 447–456.
    1. Frame PS, Fryback DG, Patterson C. Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm in men ages 60 to 80 years. Ann Intern Med. 1993;119:411–416. - PubMed
    1. Mason JM, Wakeman AP, Drummond MF, Crump BJ. Population screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm: do the benefits outweigh the costs? J Public Health Med. 1993;15:154–160. - PubMed
    1. Law MR, Morris J, Wald NJ. Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Med Screen. 1994;1:110–116. - PubMed

Publication types