Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2002 Nov;52(484):926-33.

Primary care mental health workers: models of working and evidence of effectiveness

Affiliations
Review

Primary care mental health workers: models of working and evidence of effectiveness

Peter Bower. Br J Gen Pract. 2002 Nov.

Abstract

The NHS Plan proposed the creation of a new role in primary care to assist with the management of common mental health problems: the primary care mental health worker (PCMHW). However, it is not clear how PCMHWs should be employed to be most effective. Current literature concerning different models of mental health care is reviewed. This suggests that four key dimensions are of relevance: the types of patients that PCMHWs will manage; the degree to which PCMHWs will work autonomously, or as part of a system of care; at what stage in patients' illness trajectory they will intervene; and whether the role of PCMHWs will be related to clinical interventions, or whether they will have a wider, non-clinical role in the organisation and monitoring of care. Finally, published data concerning relevant interventions are presented. Experimental studies reporting the empirical outcomes associated with these models are reviewed in relation to four different outcomes: clinical effectiveness, cost effectiveness, patient satisfaction, and access to care. The data suggest that problem-solving therapy, group psycho-education, self-help, and some models of 'collaborative care' may be highly relevant to PCMHWs. Each model provides different advantages and disadvantages in terms of the four dimensions of outcome.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Br J Gen Pract. 1998 Jan;48(426):875-9 - PubMed
    1. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1998 Jul;55(7):645-51 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Psychiatry. 1998 Jul;59(7):358-65 - PubMed
    1. Br J Psychiatry. 1998 Apr;172:359-63 - PubMed
    1. Ann Intern Med. 1998 Oct 15;129(8):654-6 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources