Femoral shaft fractures in children: traction and casting versus elastic stable intramedullary nailing

Abstract

Background: Treatment of pediatric femoral fractures by 90/90 traction and spica casting (TXN/CST) has begun to be replaced by elastic stable intramedullary nailing (ESIN). The purpose of our study was to perform a cost analysis of TXN/CST versus ESIN in addition to comparing clinical/functional parameters.

Methods: We reviewed all children admitted with femoral shaft fractures between January 1995 and April 1998. Overall cost and clinical/radiographic outcome measures were analyzed, and 60% of patients' parents completed a follow-up telephone interview. Sixty-eight patients representing 71 femoral shaft fractures that had complete data and 1-year follow-up were included.

Results: No difference existed between the two groups for standard clinical/functional criteria. ESIN was associated with a lower overall cost than TXN/CST. ESIN also resulted in better scar acceptance, and higher overall parent satisfaction.

Conclusion: Less cost and comparable clinical outcome make ESIN a better option than traditional TXN/CST for femoral fracture care in the skeletally immature patient.