Biomechanical study on the effect of cervical spine fusion on adjacent-level intradiscal pressure and segmental motion
- PMID: 12435970
- DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200211150-00003
Biomechanical study on the effect of cervical spine fusion on adjacent-level intradiscal pressure and segmental motion
Abstract
Study design: A biomechanical study was performed using cadaveric cervical spine specimens.
Objective: To determine the effect of cervical spine fusion on adjacent-level intradiscal pressure.
Summary of background data: Clinical studies have reported that patients with spinal fusion are at greater risk of pathology and early disc degeneration at adjacent levels. It is hypothesized that eliminating motion at one level leads to hypermobility and increased forces at adjacent levels, thus increasing the rate of disc degeneration.
Methods: Six cadaveric cervical spine specimens were tested. Specimens were stabilized at T1 and loaded at C3 to 20 degrees of flexion and 15 degrees of extension. Intradiscal pressures and segmental motion at C4-C5 and C6-C7 were recorded first on intact specimens, and then after anterior cervical plating at C5-C6. Changes in intradiscal pressure and segmental motion were calculated and statistically analyzed using a paired Student t test.
Results: Intradiscal pressures were significantly increased during flexion at both adjacent levels. The pressure increased by 73.2% at C4-C5 (P = 0.002), and by 45.3% at C6-C7 (P = 0.006). Intradiscal pressures increased at both adjacent levels during extension, but not significantly. During flexion, segmental motion increased at both adjacent levels, with greater increases at C4-C5. During extension, segmental motion increased at both adjacent levels, with greater increases at C6-C7.
Conclusions: Clinical studies have reported increased rates of disc degeneration at levels adjacent to fusion. It is believed that eliminating motion through fusion shifts the load to the adjacent levels, causing earlier disc degeneration. This study has shown that significant increases in intradiscal pressure and segmental motion occur at levels adjacent to fusion during normal range of motion. These results may partially explain the mechanism of early disc degeneration at levels adjacent to cervical spine fusion.
Similar articles
-
Effect of lower two-level anterior cervical fusion on the superior adjacent level.J Neurosurg Spine. 2007 Sep;7(3):336-40. doi: 10.3171/SPI-07/09/336. J Neurosurg Spine. 2007. PMID: 17877270
-
Biomechanical comparison of adjacent segmental motion after ventral cervical fixation with varying angles of lordosis.Spine J. 2007 Mar-Apr;7(2):216-21. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2006.05.018. Spine J. 2007. PMID: 17321972
-
Adjacent-level range of motion and intradiscal pressure after posterior cervical decompression and fixation: an in vitro human cadaveric model.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Jun 1;37(13):E778-85. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31824780b8. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012. PMID: 22228326
-
Predicting the risk of adjacent segment pathology in the cervical spine: a systematic review.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Oct 15;37(22 Suppl):S52-64. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31826d60fb. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012. PMID: 22885828
-
In Vitro Biomechanics of the Cervical Spine: A Systematic Review.J Biomech Eng. 2022 Oct 1;144(10):100801. doi: 10.1115/1.4054439. J Biomech Eng. 2022. PMID: 35482019
Cited by
-
Hybrid Surgery Versus Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion in Multilevel Cervical Disc Diseases: A Meta-Analysis.Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 May;95(21):e3621. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003621. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016. Retraction in: Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Oct;98(40):e17483. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000017483. Corrected and republished in: Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Jan;99(5):e19055. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000019055. PMID: 27227922 Free PMC article. Retracted. Corrected and republished. Review.
-
Can We Rely on Prophylactic Two-Level Vertebral Cement Augmentation in Long-Segment Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery to Reduce the Incidence of Proximal Junctional Complications?Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 May 24;60(6):860. doi: 10.3390/medicina60060860. Medicina (Kaunas). 2024. PMID: 38929477 Free PMC article.
-
Dynamic foraminal dimensions during neck motion 6.5 years after fusion and artificial disc replacement.PLoS One. 2020 Aug 11;15(8):e0237350. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237350. eCollection 2020. PLoS One. 2020. PMID: 32780779 Free PMC article.
-
Cervical disc replacement - emerging equivalency to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.Int Orthop. 2016 Jun;40(6):1329-34. doi: 10.1007/s00264-016-3181-8. Epub 2016 Apr 8. Int Orthop. 2016. PMID: 27055447 Review.
-
Clinical and radiological comparison of the zero-profile anchored cage and traditional cage-plate fixation in single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.Eur J Med Res. 2022 Sep 30;27(1):189. doi: 10.1186/s40001-022-00813-w. Eur J Med Res. 2022. PMID: 36175990 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous