Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1975 Dec 30;220(2):89-97.
doi: 10.1007/BF00667114.

Attitudes of men toward contraception

Attitudes of men toward contraception

L Keith et al. Arch Gynakol. .

Abstract

This report describes a pilot study conducted to determine the attitudes of men toward contraception. A questionnaire elicited responses from 436 males regarding: Personal data; contraceptive responsibility; contraceptive knowledge; use of contraception and preference for future methods. Results include attitudes toward contraceptive responsibility, assistance to pregnant partners and knowledge regarding eight common contraceptives. Usage of contraceptives in general and condoms and withdrawal specifically is reported. Preference for eight common contraceptive methods is also presented, along with data on delay of intercourse due to lack of contraceptives, partners' requests for male use of condoms/withdrawal and attitudes toward dissemination of contraceptive material to the public. Also reported are attitudes toward development of new contraceptives, use of male sterility shots or pills and the prices that men would pay for newly developed male contraceptives. The most preferred male contraceptive for future development is reported. It was concluded that the survey form and methodology were valid; that men desired to participate in family regulation; that the majority of men placed a low economic value on male contraceptives and finally that the overwhelming majority of men wanted contraceptive information to be widely disseminated in the public.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

References

    1. Am J Public Health. 1972 Nov;62(11):1451-3 - PubMed
    1. Fam Plann Perspect. 1972 Oct;4(4):27-30 - PubMed
    1. Chic Med Sch Q. 1971;30(2-4):59-63 - PubMed
    1. Fam Plann Perspect. 1972 Jul;4(3):37-44 - PubMed
    1. Fam Plann Perspect. 1972 Jul;4(3):9-12 - PubMed

Substances