Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2002 Nov 18;87(11):1275-80.
doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6600617.

Morphometrical malignancy grading is a valuable prognostic factor in invasive ductal breast cancer

Affiliations

Morphometrical malignancy grading is a valuable prognostic factor in invasive ductal breast cancer

P Kronqvist et al. Br J Cancer. .

Abstract

The aim of the present study is to augment the prognostic power of breast cancer grading by elaboration of quantitative histopathological methods. We focus on the recently introduced morphometrical grading system in which the three grading sub-features of the WHO grading system are evaluated with the help of computerised nuclear morphometry, and quantitative methods for assessing mitotic activity and tubular differentiation. The prognostic value of the morphometrical grading system is now confirmed in a material of 159 cases of invasive ductal breast cancer. In the current material the morphometrical grading system very efficiently predicted the prognosis of breast cancer by dividing the patients into favourable (grade I), intermediate (grade II), and unfavourable (grade III) outcome (P<0.0001). The morphometrical grading system was especially efficient in identifying patients with the most unfavourable outcome. In our material the morphometrical grade III was associated with a 5.4-fold risk of breast cancer death. In light of the present results, the morphometrical grading can be applied to clinical use as an aid in treatment decisions of patients with invasive ductal breast cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The morphometrical grading system separated the patients with tumours of grades I, II, and III with high statistical significance (P<0.0001).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Survival curves for the subjective grades I, II, and III did not stratify the patients with different outcome of disease with statistical significance (P=0.275).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. AaltomaaSLipponenPEskelinenMAlhavaESyrjänenK1991Nuclear morphometry and mitotic indexes as prognostic factors in breast cancer Eur J Surg 157319332 - PubMed
    1. BaakJPAvan DiestPJAriensA1989The Multicenter Morphometric Mammary Carcinoma Project (MMMCP). A nation-wide prospective study on reproducibility and prognostic power of routine quantitative assessments in the Netherlands Path Res Pract 185664670 - PubMed
    1. BloomHJGRichardsonWW1957Histological grading and prognosis in breast cancer. A study of 1409 cases of which 359 have been followed for 15 years Br J Cancer 11359377 - PMC - PubMed
    1. CalleRViloqJRZafraniBViehlPForquetA1986Local control and survival of breast cancer treated by limited surgery followed by radiation Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 12873878 - PubMed
    1. ClaytonF1991Pathologic correlates of survival in 378 lymph node-negative infiltrating ductal breast carcinomas. Mitotic count is the best single predictor Cancer 6813091317 - PubMed

Publication types