Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1975 Jun 13;8(5):371-6.
doi: 10.1007/BF00562665.

Bioavailability studies with Digoxin-Sandoz and Lanoxin

Comparative Study

Bioavailability studies with Digoxin-Sandoz and Lanoxin

T Beveridge et al. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. .

Abstract

Various brands of digoxin tablets, and even different batches of one brand, may differ greatly in bioavailability. Digoxin-Sandoz tablets have been compared with Lanoxin manufactured between 1969 and 1972 and after May 1972. Comparisons were also made between and within batches of Digoxin-Sandoz tablets. Three separate cross-over studies were conducted involving a total of 20 volunteers. Digoxin-Sandoz tablets were shown to have a constant bioavailability and to produce plasma concentrations very similar to ""new'' Lanoxin. Storage for 2 years of one batch of Digoxin-Sandoz did not alter the bioavailability. Particle size was shown to influence bioavailability. Care should be exercised when plasma data alone are interpreted as an index of bioavailability. Measures of bioavailability based on plasma data obtained up to 6 h after administration differed from those based on cumulative urinary excretion data (in this study by a factor of about 2), which can lead to the belief that a difference in bioavailability is much greater than is actually the case. Data from cumulative urinary excretion, collected over a sufficiently long period of time, are likely to be the most reliable method for determining the bioavailability of a substance such as digoxin.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Lancet. 1973 Sep 1;2(7827):499 - PubMed
    1. N Engl J Med. 1971 Dec 9;285(24):1344-7 - PubMed
    1. Br Med J. 1973 Nov 10;4(5888):323-6 - PubMed
    1. Lancet. 1973 Jul;2(7822):209-10 - PubMed
    1. Br Med J. 1973 Oct 20;4(5885):132-4 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources